AMD Radeon R9 Fury X: How Does It Stack Up In 2020 Against Navi? (Page 11)

| Jun 6, 2020 at 11:15 am CDT



You'd be surprised: Fury X runs pretty damn cool at just 58C. It's the coolest card on my charts next to the just-reviewed ASUS TUF Gaming X3 OC Radeon RX 5700 graphics card with its revised thermal solution. You can read the full review on that here.

But damn, 58C.

AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X might not win performance crowns, but it wins the thermal performance here. Remember, it does have a huge AIO cooler and I'm not a fan (if you'll pardon the pun) of that. I'd rather an air-cooled card for convenience, but the thermal performance here is warranted -- 58C is a stellar achievement.

Power Consumption

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X: How Does It Stack Up In 2020 Against Navi? 111 |

It's not overly power hungry, but it still sees my Intel Core i7-8700K test bed chewing up to 300W under load. This puts it above the Radeon RX 5700 XT reference card, and just under an overclocked Radeon RX 5700 XT -- but with far less performance.

Last updated: Jun 8, 2020 at 01:46 am CDT

Buy at Amazon

Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB HBM

TodayYesterday7 days ago30 days ago
Buy at Amazon
* Prices last scanned on 7/9/2020 at 1:21 pm CDT - prices may not be accurate, click links above for the latest price. We may earn an affiliate commission.


Anthony is a long time PC enthusiast with a passion of hate for games built around consoles. FPS gaming since the pre-Quake days, where you were insulted if you used a mouse to aim, he has been addicted to gaming and hardware ever since. Working in IT retail for 10 years gave him great experience with custom-built PCs. His addiction to GPU tech is unwavering.

We openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond.

Related Tags