Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,385 Reviews & Articles | 64,034 News Posts

Lexar NS200 SSD Review

By Chris Ramseyer from Apr 5, 2019 @ 10:00 CDT
TweakTown Rating: 87%Manufacturer: Lexar

512GB Class Performance Testing

 

Product Comparison

 

We pulled a wide range of 512GB class SATA SSDs to compare to the new Lexar NS200. The drive's most obvious competition is the popular MX500 and seemingly timeless 860 EVO.

 

 

Sequential Read Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_001

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_002

 

Top SATA SSD speeds have topped out long ago so in the first two tests we don't see a lot of variation between the drives.

 

Sequential Write Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_003

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_004

 

There is a bit more in the write tests but for the most part, the sequential write performance is within 10%, and most users wouldn't notice the difference transferring data.

 

Sustained Sequential Write Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_005

 

Writing a lot of data to the drives allows us to further separate the products by performance. The Lexar NS200 performs really well in this test and meets the best SATA SSDs at the top for most of the user capacity. The NS200 does show the largest drop in performance after the SLC buffer fills.

 

Random Read Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_006

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_007

 

The low queue depth random read performance is what we wanted to see most of all in the early synthetic testing. This is what makes a drive feel fast in your PC and where the SMI SM2258 with Micron 64L TLC dominates the SATA SSD industry.

 

The Lexar NS200 joins the Crucial MX500 with nearly 12,000 random read IOPS at queue depth (QD) 1. The drive scales really well and surpasses 22,000 IOPS at QD 2.

 

Random Write Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_008

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_009

 

The random performance similarities don't stop with the reads. The NS200 random write performance curve is nearly identical to the MX500's.

 

70% Read Sequential Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_010

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_011

 

We see the most separation between the products in performance when mixing reads and writes in our test. The 70% read workload is the industry standard test and leans closer to workstation workloads.

 

The Lexar NS200 performs well in this test but can't muster the high sequential peaks provided by the Samsung 860 EVO and Toshiba VX500.

 

70% Read Random Performance

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_012

 

lexar-ns200-ssd-review_013

 

Moving over to random mixed data, the NS200 again joins the MX500 away from the other products at low queue depths.

Lexar NS200 2.5" SATA III (6Gb/s) Solid-State Drive 240 GB

Today Yesterday 7 days ago 30 days ago
- - -
Buy

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.


Related Tags