Technology and gaming content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,610 Reviews & Articles | 60,928 News Posts

Lexar NS200 SSD Review (Page 2)

Chris Ramseyer | Apr 5, 2019 at 10:00 am CDT - 2 mins, 4 secs time to read this page
Rating: 87%Manufacturer: Lexar

512GB Class Performance Testing

Product Comparison

We pulled a wide range of 512GB class SATA SSDs to compare to the new Lexar NS200. The drive's most obvious competition is the popular MX500 and seemingly timeless 860 EVO.

Sequential Read Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 001 |
Lexar NS200 SSD Review 002 |

Top SATA SSD speeds have topped out long ago so in the first two tests we don't see a lot of variation between the drives.

Sequential Write Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 003 |
Lexar NS200 SSD Review 004 |

There is a bit more in the write tests but for the most part, the sequential write performance is within 10%, and most users wouldn't notice the difference transferring data.

Sustained Sequential Write Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 005 |

Writing a lot of data to the drives allows us to further separate the products by performance. The Lexar NS200 performs really well in this test and meets the best SATA SSDs at the top for most of the user capacity. The NS200 does show the largest drop in performance after the SLC buffer fills.

Random Read Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 006 |
Lexar NS200 SSD Review 007 |

The low queue depth random read performance is what we wanted to see most of all in the early synthetic testing. This is what makes a drive feel fast in your PC and where the SMI SM2258 with Micron 64L TLC dominates the SATA SSD industry.

The Lexar NS200 joins the Crucial MX500 with nearly 12,000 random read IOPS at queue depth (QD) 1. The drive scales really well and surpasses 22,000 IOPS at QD 2.

Random Write Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 008 |
Lexar NS200 SSD Review 009 |

The random performance similarities don't stop with the reads. The NS200 random write performance curve is nearly identical to the MX500's.

70% Read Sequential Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 010 |
Lexar NS200 SSD Review 011 |

We see the most separation between the products in performance when mixing reads and writes in our test. The 70% read workload is the industry standard test and leans closer to workstation workloads.

The Lexar NS200 performs well in this test but can't muster the high sequential peaks provided by the Samsung 860 EVO and Toshiba VX500.

70% Read Random Performance

Lexar NS200 SSD Review 012 |
Lexar NS200 SSD Review 013 |

Moving over to random mixed data, the NS200 again joins the MX500 away from the other products at low queue depths.

Last updated: Nov 15, 2019 at 01:16 pm CST

Buy at Amazon

Lexar NS200 2.5" SATA III (6Gb/s) Solid-State Drive 240 GB

TodayYesterday7 days ago30 days ago
Buy at Amazon
* Prices last scanned on 5/26/2020 at 11:08 am CDT - prices may not be accurate, click links above for the latest price. We may earn an affiliate commission.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR - Chris Ramseyer

Chris Ramseyer started his career as a LAN Party organizer in Midwest USA. After working with several computer companies he was asked to join the team at The Adrenaline Vault by fellow Midwest LAN Party legend Sean Aikins. After a series of shake ups at AVault, Chris eventually took over as Editor-in-Chief before leaving to start Real World Entertainment. Look for Chris to bring his unique methods of testing Hard Disk Drives, Solid State Drives as well as RAID controller and NAS boxes to TweakTown as he looks to provide an accurate test bed to make your purchasing decisions easier.

We openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond.

Related Tags