A 1TB iPhone 18 Pro Max equipped with QLC NAND briefly saw its write throughput collapse to 1.1 MB/s after its caches were exhausted in a storage benchmark. The handset also trailed a TLC-equipped 512GB iPhone 18 Pro in HOMOLAB's random and mixed storage tests.

Storage-testing channel HOMOLAB used FIO to compare the two devices. During 128K sequential writes beginning with the nearly empty 1TB handset, its dynamic SLC cache delivered more than 3,000 MB/s and covered approximately 250GB. Performance then fell to an average of 578 MB/s in a pseudo-TLC stage before the QLC write-back phase averaged 79.4 MB/s, with a minimum of 25.6 MB/s.
Popular Now: CyberPowerPC sells rigs with NVIDIA RTX 5070 and 5080 Founders Edition GPUs via Walmart, but latter models vanish in a flashHOMOLAB repeated the benchmark after filling 60% of the phone's storage. Its SLC cache then shrank to 58GB, pseudo-TLC performance averaged 396 MB/s, and the QLC write-back stage averaged 45 MB/s while briefly reaching the widely cited 1.1 MB/s minimum.

That minimum should not be mistaken for the phone's normal write speed or its performance whenever the storage is 60% full. It appeared late in a synthetic worst-case workload after prolonged continuous writing, and the published graph does not reveal how long it persisted.


Frequently Asked Questions
Open a question for an answer from TweakTown's coverage of this news, or ask your own below.
How does the iPhone 18 Pro Max's 1TB QLC storage behave during long 4K or ProRes recording sessions?
What happens to the iPhone 18 Pro Max's storage performance when the phone is already partially full?
Why did the 1TB iPhone 18 Pro Max trail the 512GB iPhone 18 Pro in random and mixed storage tests?
Could large file transfers or backup restores hit the slowest write stage on the iPhone 18 Pro Max?
Have a question that isn't listed here? Ask below, and TweakBot will answer it.
The finding should not be completely disregarded, however. Everyday activities such as messaging, browsing, and casual photography are unlikely to exhaust the faster caches, but extended high-bitrate 4K or ProRes recording, very large file transfers, and backup restoration could expose the slower stage. Those workloads are particularly relevant because Apple explicitly markets its Pro models towards creators and professional users.








