Technology content trusted by users in North America and around the world.
4,953 Articles | 29,877 Posts
Select Your Edition:  
Tweakipedia
A wealth of
tech information!

TRENDING NOW: Sony teases first look at PlayStation 4 hardware, says it will be shown at E3
USA EditionYou are located: Home > Reviews > Storage > Patriot Pyro SE 240GB Solid State Drive Review

Patriot Pyro SE 240GB Solid State Drive Review

By: (more) | Storage Content | Posted: Jan 17, 2012 12:20 am
Comment | Print | Email | Font Size: AA
TweakTown Rating: 91%    Manufacturer: Patriot

Introduction

 

patriot_pyro_se_240gb_solid_state_drive_review

 

2011 has come to an end, but that doesn't mean technology is slowing down one bit. For the second year in a row the solid state drive market was dominated by SandForce. If you wanted to produce a drive that was capable of the highest performance possible, you needed to start with a SandForce SF-2200 Series controller and pair it with either ONFi 2.0 or Toggle Mode NAND flash.

 

Looking out on the horizon we don't see SandForce trying to leap frog themselves early this year and we don't see why they would need to. Last month we looked at the latest from Indilinx (OCZ Octane) and Marvell (Corsair Performance Pro) and neither controller managed to muster the performance of the SF-2281. Sometime in the middle of 2012 we'll see Team SandForce manufactures move to 24nm Toggle Mode and maybe even 20nm IMFT flash, but neither of these technologies will bring a great deal to the table over the tried and true SF-2281 / synchronous flash combination we have today. The Patriot Pyro SE uses this magical combination to deliver amazing performance for general computing tasks and at an equally amazing price point.

 

Patriot's Pyro brand hasn't been a stranger to our pages. We've looked at the 120GB and 240GB baseline models with asynchronous and found them to be the entry level for high speed SSDs in 2011. The Pyro SE is the next evolution, a tick higher on the ladder and uses more expensive but faster performing synchronous flash.

 

Both products offer very good access times, the performance you feel while opening programs and Windows, but the SE is capable of delivering greater performance when the drive start to get populated with data. Our Fill Test shows the SE is capable of substantial performance gains or more appropriately less performance loss when compared to the asynchronous flash models on the market.


Page 1 of 13

Related Tags


Content Gallery

Further Reading: Read and find more Storage content at our Storage reviews, guides and articles index page.

TweakTown RSS FeedDo you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Post a Comment about this content



Check out our
RSS feeds!
  • Upcoming Content: PQI Air Card 4GB Wi-Fi SDHC Review
  • Upcoming Content: LaCie CloudBox 1TB Personal NAS Review
  • Upcoming Content: Star Trek: The Next Generation - Season Three (1989) Blu-ray Review
  • Upcoming Content: The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (2012) Blu-ray Movie Review
  • Upcoming Content: Whatever happened to Comodo Time Machine?
  • Upcoming Content: SuperSpeed RamDisk Plus 11 Software Review
  • Upcoming Content: HP Envy TouchSmart 4 Touchscreen Ultrabook Laptop Review
  • Upcoming Content: MSI Radeon HD 7790 1GB OC Overclocked Video Card Review
  • Upcoming Content: ADATA DashDrive Elite UE700 USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review
  • Upcoming Content: Kingston DT Workspace 64GB 'Windows To Go' USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review
  • Upcoming Content: MyDigitalSSD BP4 240GB mSATA Review


Storage News Posts

View More Storage News Posts


TweakTown Web Poll

Question: What new stuff are you most excited to see at Computex Taipei 2013?

Cases, Coolers & PSU’s

CPU's

Gadgets

GPU's & Video Cards

Keyboards & Mice

Laptops, Tablets & Phones

Motherboards & Chipsets

New Tech

SSD's & Memory

Booth Babes

or View the Results

View More Polls

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Storage Press Releases

View More Storage Press Releases