Crucial refuses to send back a user's defective RAM, also denies warranty replacement

A Redditor's warranty saga with Crucial is making the rounds, and it doesn't paint the brand in a good light. According to a post on r/pcmasterrace, Reddit user Forsaken_Bet3568 filed an RMA for a defective DDR5 SO-DIMM kit, but that was perhaps a poor decision in hindsight.

Crucial apparently agreed to replace it, then walked that back and offered only a refund at the original price, saying they had no replacement inventory. When the user asked for the defective kit back instead, hoping to try a warranty claim through the original seller, Crucial refused that too.

Crucial's email response, screenshotted and shared by the user, cites the wind-down of the Crucial consumer business as the reason it can't facilitate any outbound shipments of returned warranty products. It also declined to reimburse the roughly 14 euros the customer spent shipping the RAM back in the first place. That's excessively stingy, as the user hadn't even asked for that money back.

3

This is a genuinely strange situation. The murky part is whether Crucial has any obligation to hand back a product it already accepted once it decides it can't replace or meaningfully refund it. My gut says the customer probably should be entitled to get the kit back, since retailers like Amazon often run their own replacement programs regardless of whose fault the defect is. Denying both options leaves the customer with only a fraction of what the RAM is worth today.

That is also something that wouldn't sit well with the customer. DDR5 prices have roughly doubled or worse over the past year, so a refund at the original purchase price is nowhere close to what it costs to buy the same kit now. Something similar played out with Samsung and YouTuber Louis Rossmann earlier this year, when Samsung tried to offer an SSD's original purchase price instead of a replacement, before eventually settling closer to current market value. Crucial hasn't shown any sign it's willing to do the same.

It probably doesn't help that Crucial isn't really a going concern anymore. Micron announced in December it was exiting the Crucial consumer business entirely to focus on AI-driven enterprise memory, and the brand has apparently stopped restocking replacement parts. Warranty support was supposed to continue after the wind-down, but this case suggests it's probably unreliable once stock runs out.

Manufacturers have gotten cagey about RMAs before, like Intel denying replacement requests for some faulty 13th and 14th Gen CPUs even after initially agreeing to a refund. Crucial's case looks worse, though, since it isn't disputing that the RAM is defective. It simply has nothing to send back and apparently doesn't want the customer to have other options either.

3

Frequently Asked Questions

TweakBot answers common questions about this news using TweakTown's own coverage from this page and related content from our archive. All answers are generated from TweakTown content and not outside sources. Tap a question to reveal the answer, or type your own below related to this content.

Question #1

What reason did Crucial give for refusing to send a replacement or return the defective DDR5 SO‑DIMM kit?

Click to reveal answer

Question #2

How does the Micron/Cruicial consumer business wind‑down factor into Crucial’s RMA response?

Click to reveal answer

Question #3

What alternative does the Reddit user recommend instead of filing a warranty claim with Crucial?

Click to reveal answer

Question #4

Does the article explain whether retailers like Amazon might still offer replacements even if Crucial won’t?

Click to reveal answer

Have a question about this content not listed here? Ask below and TweakBot will answer it.

Your questionAsk

Answering your question×

TweakBot is analyzing your question…

Could not get an answer

TweakBot is generating an answer

Read More

Was TweakBot helpful?Thanks for the feedback!

The user is now advising other RAM owners against filing warranty claims with Crucial at all, and recommending they go through the retailer instead.