EA quickly folds after College Football 27 got review bombed on Steam for invasive microtransactions

EA Sports College Football 27 is the first game in the revived franchise to land on PC, and by most accounts, the on-field gameplay is a real step up over last year's entry. That improvement is, however, getting buried under a wave of Steam reviews, with the game currently sitting in "Mostly Negative" territory after only about a quarter to a third of reviews came back positive.

5

The anger is focused mainly on Dynasty and Road to Glory, the two single-player career modes that let you run a college program or take a created player through their career. Previous entries let players adjust XP sliders to speed up progression at their own pace. That option is gone in College Football 27, replaced with "College Football Points" that let you pay real money to skip the grind.

Reviewers say reaching the max coach level under the new default pacing could take well over a hundred simulated seasons without paying, and some estimate maxing out a coach through points alone would cost more than the game itself. A few content creators who got early access have also claimed these systems weren't present in their preview builds, making accusations that EA slipped the monetization in right before launch to avoid tanking early impressions.

5

What's made this land harder than usual is that Dynasty and Road to Glory are supposed to be single-player modes with little or no online interaction. There's no matchmaking, no live service, nothing that would typically justify a storefront. Players are used to EA leaning on microtransactions in Ultimate Team, but watching that model creep into a solo career mode is devastating.

This quickly tipped this into a full-blown backlash, with the hashtag #CFBPlayDontPay spreading well beyond the College Football community and even showing up in EA FC discussions, where fans are worried that the same playbook might be coming for Career Mode next. That movement, along with the negative Steam reviews, put real pressure on EA.

5

Surprisingly, the pressure actually worked. EA announced it's pulling all paid progression from Dynasty and Road to Glory, just days after launch, crediting player feedback for the reversal. It's a rare case of a review-bomb campaign getting a publisher to fold this quickly, though it's still unclear if players who already bought points will see any kind of refund.

5

Frequently Asked Questions

TweakBot answers common questions about this news using TweakTown's own coverage from this page and related content from our archive. Tap a question to reveal the answer, or type your own below.

Question #1

Will players who already purchased College Football Points get refunds now that paid progression was removed?

It is unclear. The article says EA pulled paid progression days after launch but notes it is still unclear if players who already bought points will receive refunds.

Answered

Question #2

How did the removal of XP sliders and default pacing impact progression speed in Dynasty and Road to Glory?

Removing the XP sliders and imposing a slow default pacing made progression extremely slow, with reviewers saying reaching max coach level could take well over a hundred simulated seasons without paying. Players also reported that maxing out via the new paid College Football Points system would cost more than the game itself, prompting EA to remove paid progression.

Answered

Question #3

Could the pay-to-skip system return in a future patch or sequel for College Football or EA FC?

Yes. Even though EA removed paid progression from Dynasty and Road to Glory after the backlash, the article notes EA has a history of invasive microtransactions and says the feature is likely to return in future College Football and EA FC entries. The reversal was swift but not presented as a permanent change in company direction.

Answered

Question #4

Were the microtransaction systems present in review or preview builds sent to content creators?

Some content creators who received early access said the microtransaction systems were not present in their preview builds, alleging EA added the monetization shortly before launch to avoid harming early impressions. These claims are reported in the article as part of the controversy.

Answered

Have a question not listed here? Ask below and TweakBot will answer it.

Your questionAsk

Answering your question×

TweakBot is analyzing your question…

Could not get an answer

TweakBot is generating an answer

Read More

Was TweakBot helpful?Thanks for the feedback!

However, just because EA backed out of their stance doesn't erase the fact that they implemented it in the first place. EA has received plenty of criticism for its invasive microtransactions before, and it hasn't changed course significantly. I would still be worried for future College Football and EA FC entries, because this feature is going to come back sooner or later.