🔥 XPG XENIA 15 2021 Version gaming laptop prototype giveaway! 🔥

Epic vs Apple trial judge: 'Epic overreached with antitrust claims'

US District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers rules that Apple isn't in violation of antitrust law, says Epic 'overreached'

Published Sat, Sep 11 2021 12:17 PM CDT

The Epic vs Apple trial is over, and US District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has effectively changed the App Store forever. But that doesn't mean Apple violated any antitrust law.

Epic vs Apple trial judge: 'Epic overreached with antitrust claims' 400 | TweakTown.com

In an expansive 185-page ruling, Judge Rogers details specifics on Epic's claims and Apple's counterclaims in the industry-defining trial. The court finds that Apple isn't in violation of antitrust law and isn't a monopoly. Apple did, however, break provisions set forth in the California Unfair Competition Law, which has led to a permanent injunction forcing Apple to allow developers to redirect consumers to buy content outside of the App Store and potentially avoid its costly 30% commission.

The court says that while Apple's "conduct falls within the purview of an incipient antitrust violation with particular anticompetitive practices which have not been justified" (essentially Apple was showing early signs of antitrust by keeping consumers in the dark about its 30% commission and prohibiting third-party payment methods), that Epic Games overreached with its antitrust claims.

Read Also: Apple's 30% App Store commission is 'supracompetitive and excessive,' court declares

Judge Rogers claims that the games industry is "ripe for exploitation" but indicates some of Epic's complaints were premature. If Epic had brought more evidence then the courts may have declared Apple in violation of antitrust law.

"This trial highlighted that "big tech" encompasses many markets, including as relevant here, the submarket for mobile gaming transactions. This lucrative, $100 billion, market has not been fully tapped and is ripe for economic exploitation," Judge Gonzalez Rogers wrote.

"As a major player in the wider video gaming industry, Epic Games brought this lawsuit to challenge Apple's control over access to a considerable portion of this submarket for mobile gaming transactions.

"Ultimately, Epic Games overreached. As a consequence, the trial record was not as fulsome with respect to antitrust conduct in the relevant market as it could have been."

Buy at Amazon

Steve Jobs: The Exclusive Biography

TodayYesterday7 days ago30 days ago
* Prices last scanned on 9/27/2021 at 9:39 am CDT - prices may not be accurate, click links above for the latest price. We may earn an affiliate commission.

Derek joined the TweakTown team in 2015 and has since reviewed and played 1000s of hours of new games. Derek is absorbed with the intersection of technology and gaming, and is always looking forward to new advancements. With over six years in games journalism under his belt, Derek aims to further engage the gaming sector while taking a peek under the tech that powers it. He hopes to one day explore the stars in No Man's Sky with the magic of VR.

Newsletter Subscription

Related Tags

Newsletter Subscription
Latest News
View More News
Latest Reviews
View More Reviews
Latest Articles
View More Articles