Game Load Time
With synthetic workloads, the ADATA SX6000 Pro trails many of the more established drives but rarely falls significantly behind. We don't expect the drive to win any application tests, but at the low price, it doesn't need to. The drive just needs to stay close to the models that cost more.
In the game load-time test featuring Final Fantasy Stormblood, the SX6000 Pro trails the Mushkin Helix-L by around 1 second. It's not a lot of time, and neither is the time it trails the SX8200 Pro that tops our performance chart. I would say that most people wouldn't even notice the difference.
PCMark 8 Total Storage Bandwidth
The PCMark 8 Storage Test uses a mix between light and demanding applications. We take the ten individual test results and summarize them in an easy to compare throughput score.
The more demanding tests drive the SX6000 Pro to the bottom of the chart. Just because the SX8200 Pro nearly doubles the SX6000 Pro's throughput score doesn't mean that every user will notice an application taking longer to load and complete a task. The lighter IO workloads from the more common applications will be very close performance but the heavier applications, like very large Photoshop batches, will take quite a bit longer and users will notice.
PCMark 8 Extended Storage Test
The ADATA SX6000 Pro puts out a lot of mixed messages in our performance testing. Under very heavy workloads, the drive performs better than the Crucial P1, Intel 660p, Mushkin Helix and the Mushkin Pilot. We can't wait to see what Realtek's high-performance 8-channel controller is capable of.
SYSmark 2014 SE System Responsiveness and Power Tests
It's difficult to break into the upper tier in the Responsiveness Test with Toshiba flash. Micron 3D and Samsung V-NAND dominate the upper section of the chart. The DRAMless design adds increased complexity to the struggle.
MobileMark 2012 1.5 Notebook Battery Life
When the controller companies first pitched media DRAMless designs, low-power consumption was always a highlight. In practice, we've found that these drives take longer to complete background activities, like garbage collection. The longer load time means the drives also take longer to enter low power states to conserve energy. The result is similar, or slightly worse, notebook battery life compared to other drives with a DRAM package to cache the table map.
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Google's next 'Nest Mini' speaker is a 'substantial' upgrade all round
- Age of Empires IV news slipped, fans advised to watch XO19 for info
- Eminem's publisher to sue Spotify for BILLIONS of unpaid music streams
- Mortal Kombat 11 DLC pack: Terminator T-800, Joker + 4 more fighters
- New Nintendo Switch model +70% battery life, performance & pink screen
- Mushkin Pilot-E NVMe M.2 SSD Review
- Team Group T-Force Cardea Liquid M.2 SSD Review
- Synology DS620slim Six-Bay SFF NAS Review
- LaCie Rugged RAID Shuttle Review
- Pengo USB-C Dock Review
- FSP Unveils FlexGURU 250W and 300W Modular Power Supplies New PSUs are perfect for IPC, NAS, HTPC and edge computing
- Gameforge Opens Pre-Orders and Announces November Release for the Highly Anticipated Kingdom Under Fire 2
- Philips Brings Precision Computer Peripherals to US
- KORN Battle Concert is Now Live in AdventureQuest 3D!
- NEC: Industrial Internet Consortium Approves Testbed of Negotiation Automation Platform for coordinating interests among AI systems