Tech content trusted by users in North America and around the world
6,408 Reviews & Articles | 42,701 News Posts
TRENDING NOW: NVIDIA preparing GeForce GTX 980 Ti with 6GB VRAM, faster than Titan X

Consumer (Samsung and OCZ) vs. Enterprise (SMART Optimus) SSD Performance Analysis - 8K Random Read/Write

Consumer (Samsung and OCZ) vs. Enterprise (SMART Optimus) SSD Performance Analysis
We analyze consumer SSD performance in comparison to an enterprise SSD. Ever wondered what the difference is, besides the price? Read on! (KRX:005930, NASDAQ:SNDK, NASDAQ:OCZ)
By: | Editorials in IT/Datacenter | Posted: Apr 17, 2013 4:56 pm

8K Random Read/Write

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_10

 

The Optimus provides much more performance in a tighter range than the Vector and 840 Pro.

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_11

 

8K random read and write speed is a metric that is not tested for consumer use, but for enterprise environments this is an important aspect of performance. With several different workloads relying heavily upon 8K performance, we include this as a standard with each evaluation. Many of our Server Emulations below will also test 8K performance with various mixed read/write workloads.

 

The Vector truly shines with pure random read workloads, again topping the chart. The 840 Pro performs admirably as well, managing to best the Optimus in this test.

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_12

 

The average 8K random write speed flips the tables on the client SSDs, highlighting an inherent strength of the Optimus.

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_13

 

The relevant results of this battery of tests again fall to our write percentage testing. We can observe the massive drop in performance of the client hardware with the addition of even the slightest of write workloads.

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_14

 

The Vector manages to provide 60% of its I/O during the test at 4ms, much better than the competing SSDs. The numerous results that fall much higher, up to the limit of our recording at 200ms, conspire to remove the latency advantage. The Optimus provides steady performance with the highest results landing at 10ms.

 

Both the Vector and the 840 Pro had large percentages (10.7% and 8.2%, respectively) fall higher than our chart illustrates, at 200-400ms. More concerning is the smattering of I/O's that fell into the 800-1000ms range for both SSDs.

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_15

 

The Optimus again requires the most power for operation, and the Vector touts an impressively low power consumption.

 

consumer_samsung_and_ocz_vs_enterprise_smart_optimus_ssd_performance_analysis_16

 

The Optimus again proves to be more efficient, with an average of 2,800 IOPS per Watt. The Vector comes in second with 1,300 IOPS per Watt. The Samsung 840 Pro comes in a distant third place.

Click the banner below to learn more about SanDisk SSDs:

Related Tags

Further Reading: Read and find more IT/Datacenter content at our IT/Datacenter reviews, guides and articles index page.

Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!

Latest News Posts

View More News Posts

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Press Releases

View More Press Releases
Or Scroll Up Or Down