Technology and gaming content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,541 Reviews & Articles | 59,957 News Posts

XPG Battlecruiser Mid-Tower Chassis Review (Page 8)

Shannon Robb | Feb 19, 2020 at 10:45 am CST - 2 mins, 54 secs reading time for this page
Rating: 78%Manufacturer: XPGModel: BATTLECRUISER-BKCWW

Final Thoughts

When ADATA/XPG reached out to check this chassis out, it was at a similar timeframe to the Invader. This chassis is a lot more involved than the Invader, and this is a good thing. The Battlecruiser has tons of options to explore, but you will have to discover several as I did, on your own as their documentation does not do an adequate job of educating users.

During testing, the recorded ambient was 22.4C, with an RH of 46%. The CPU in our test build shows an average delta over ambient of 46.4C, which falls roughly in line with what I would expect from the hardware installed. The GPU was a bit of a surprise as it showed a delta of 37.8C, which places it within the top 25% of chassis I have tested to date. Overall, I would say this is an easy passing score for the Battlecruiser, even if it is not the absolute best we have tested to date.

XPG Battlecruiser Mid-Tower Chassis Review 38 | TweakTown.com

What we like

The Battlecruiser is a solid base for a chassis and comes with four ARGB right out of the box. The Battlecruiser also has several things the frame can do that are not well documented, so the more you adjust things, the more you will discover. The proposed cooling fitment is good, and with the removal of the HDD cage, you can fit some monster setups.

What do we think could be better?

Documentation, first and foremost, the manual does not cover several adjustments that the chassis can do, such as flipping the fan brackets 180 degrees to move the fans outward away from the component chamber for more clearance. The way the ARGB fans are handled is strange, and I do wish the controller could plug into the motherboard and have a sync mode. The top and front triangular ventilation can bypass filtration rendering it pointless.

The USB type-C being connected via 20-pin should be abhorred as many motherboards don't have dual 20-pin headers, but do have the proper USB 3.2 Gen 2 header. The top fitment for radiators omits larger memory sticks, which for any regular reader of my reviews, knows I have great disdain for.

At the $179.99 price, the Battlecruiser demands presently; I cannot help but feel like XPG missed the mark here. Between the lack of confidence in the filtration capabilities, to the surprising lack of clear information on chassis features form the included manual, I feel like there are better options. I do like that XPG swung for the fences here, and I hope they continue to find new suppliers and take some of the harsh criticisms to the drawing board and that we can see a far more favorable chassis design in the future.

XPG was ambitious with the Battlecruiser, and like Icarus, they flew a bit too close to the sun, and the resulting burns are apparent.

Shannon's Chassis Test System Specifications

Last updated: Feb 20, 2020 at 06:11 am CST

Buy at Amazon

Performance90%

Quality70%

Features80%

Value70%

Overall Rating78%

The Bottom Line

XPG had some very admirable goals, however, with lack of documentation and various design issues, the Battlecruiser is a good chance for XPG to right the ship.

78%

XPG Battlecruiser Super Mid-Tower Chassis

TodayYesterday7 days ago30 days ago
Buy at Amazon
$174.99$174.99$174.99
* Prices last scanned on 3/29/2020 at 6:01 am CDT - prices may not be accurate, click links above for the latest price. We may earn an affiliate commission.
Shannon Robb

ABOUT THE AUTHOR - Shannon Robb

Shannon started his PC journey around the age of six in 1989. Now till present day, he has established himself in the overclocking world, spending many years pushing the limits of hardware on LN2. Shannon has worked with design and R&D on various components, including PC systems and chassis, to optimize the layout and performance for enthusiasts.

We openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond.

Related Tags