Technology and gaming content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,546 Reviews & Articles | 60,003 News Posts

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review (Page 2)

Chris Ramseyer | Jul 31, 2019 at 10:00 am CDT - 3 mins, 22 secs reading time for this page
Rating: 95%Manufacturer: QSAN

CIFS Performance Testing

Testing Notes

We tested the QSAN XN8012R in three different configurations. All three configurations start with a base of twelve Seagate IronWolf Pro 12TB drives. The first test uses just the twelve HDDs. The second test adds a Micron 9300 Series NVMe SSD as a read-cache. The third tests uses four Seagate IronWolf 110 SATA SSDs for read cache, and two Micron 9300 Series SSDs for a write cache.

The XN8012R will only build write cache pools in RAID 1, so you can't use a single NVMe SSD for a write cache. This eliminates the possibility of using two NVMe SSDs for both read and write cache pools. The internal PCIe 3.0 slots do not work for storage devices, just network, and Thunderbolt, so you can't add a drive like the Memblaze PBlaze5 C916 with a PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.

We used a Thecus N8880U-10G for the comparison product in the charts today. The N8880U-10G was our former system used to compared NAS-focused storage products, so it's appropriate to compare it with our new system for testing the products going forward.

Sequential Read Performance

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 001 |

The sequential read test shows strong, predictable performance from the QSAN system. At 4 OIO the system outperforms the older Thecus N8880U-10G by around 100 MB/s. Both systems and all configurations peak at right around 1,200 MB/s.

Sequential Write Performance

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 002 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 003 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 004 |

The dots on the chart show the IO rate for every second. Dots appearing below the median line are outliers where the performance decreased. The QSAN configurations show less outliers than the older Thecus system. The QSAN configurations also write sequential data around 200 MB/s more than the Thecus in the preconditioning and steady-state phases of the test.

Sequential Mixed Workloads

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 005 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 006 |

With several workers operating on the NAS at the same time, the workload moves to mixed workloads as data comes and goes simultaneously. The QSAN's powerful processor allows the system to take advantage of the bidirectional nature of Ethernet. The workloads surpass the 1,200 MB/s limits that really only apply per direction, ingress and egress. Ethernet can push data in both direction at the same time, and that raises your throughput ceiling.

We wanted to see some extra performance coming from the two cache configurations with the XN8012R. The SSD cache doesn't improve sequential performance.

Random Read Performance

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 007 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 008 |

The two cache configurations instantly increase random read performance in the XN8012R. The system performs really well even without the flash drives compared to systems with only EXT4 or BTRFS file systems. The Thecus rides the floor of the chart in this test configured in EXT4. It also fails to scale as we increase the workload, and that's just the opposite of the QSAN system.

If you recall, the read cache configuration uses an NVMe SSD, and the read/write cache configuration moves the NVMe drives to the write cache, and the read cache comes from four Seagate IronWolf 110 SATA SSDs. That different read-cache technology is why we have such a large gap in the random read test. This will carry on through a few other tests as well.

Random Write Performance

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 009 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 010 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 011 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 012 |

We expected more from the read/write cache configuration in this series of charts. The Micron 9300 Series is a wicked NVMe SSD, but the XN8012R doesn't take full advantage of that power writing random data.

Random Mixed Workloads

QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 013 |
QSAN XCubeNAS XN8012R NAS Review 014 |

With the random mixed workload test, we see more separation between the read and write cache configuration and the base configuration with just the twelve HDDs. The read-only cache with the NVMe SSD walks over the other configurations in many of the mixes.

Last updated: Sep 24, 2019 at 12:29 am CDT

Buy at Amazon

XCubeNAS XN5008T Tower 8 +1 Bay Diskless

TodayYesterday7 days ago30 days ago
Buy at Amazon
* Prices last scanned on 4/2/2020 at 1:10 am CDT - prices may not be accurate, click links above for the latest price. We may earn an affiliate commission.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR - Chris Ramseyer

Chris Ramseyer started his career as a LAN Party organizer in Midwest USA. After working with several computer companies he was asked to join the team at The Adrenaline Vault by fellow Midwest LAN Party legend Sean Aikins. After a series of shake ups at AVault, Chris eventually took over as Editor-in-Chief before leaving to start Real World Entertainment. Look for Chris to bring his unique methods of testing Hard Disk Drives, Solid State Drives as well as RAID controller and NAS boxes to TweakTown as he looks to provide an accurate test bed to make your purchasing decisions easier.

We openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond.

Related Tags