Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,398 Reviews & Articles | 64,167 News Posts

WD Blue SN500 NVMe 250GB SSD Review (Page 2)

By Chris Ramseyer from Apr 9, 2019 @ 10:00 CDT
TweakTown Rating: 89%Manufacturer: Western Digital

256GB Class Performance Testing

 

Product Comparison

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_300

 

The new 250GB SN500 doesn't stand up very well against similarly priced models shipping today. Prices have fallen so low that the window between premium SATA and premium NVMe is really just a sliver compared to what it was last year with 256GB class models. We expect to see the SN500 price to shrink over time, as with all new SSDs. That hasn't happened just yet with this new release, but the other drives in this review have all hit record lows.

 

Sequential Read Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_001

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_002

 

The new WD Blue SN500 NVMe delivers similar sequential read performance that we found in other purpose-built entry-level and mainstream SSDs. The PCIe x2 interface doesn't allow the drive to reach the same sequential levels as the drives with twice the available bandwidth.

 

 

Sequential Write Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_003

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_004

 

We can say the same when it comes to large block size sequential writes. The SN500 delivers better than expected sequential write performance. The small number of flash die limit the write performance of modern 256GB SSDs. We point to the SN500 outperforming the Intel SSD 760p (with a x4 lane interface) and use the results to show how efficient BiCS FLASH can be.

 

Sustained Sequential Write Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_005

 

The 250GB SN500 uses a relatively small SLC buffer size compared to many of the new controller designs with dynamic buffers. The cache is large enough for incoming random data but doesn't do a lot for your large block size files, like movies and music. The native TLC write performance is just over 400 MB/s, around 100 MB/s higher than many other SSDs in this capacity.

 

Random Read Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_006

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_007

 

Of the drives tested for the charts today, the 250GB SN500 delivers the lowest random read performance. At QD1, the drive doesn't hit 8,000 IOPS and that's unfortunate in a world where mainstream SATA SSDs surpass 11,000 IOPS at the same queue depth.

 

Random Write Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_008

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_009

 

We asked a WD representative about host memory buffer technology and were surprised to learn the drive doesn't use this technology. The drive still performs well in small block size random data writes. It performs much better than we expected, but we do foresee some issues with mixed random workloads without the technology.

 

70% Read Sequential Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_010

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_011

 

Despite its interface disadvantage, the SN500 delivers strong sequential mixed read and write performance. The drive outperformed nearly every other drive on the chart other than the MyDigitalSSD BPX Pro with a similar controller architecture.

 

70% Read Random Performance

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_012

 

wd-blue-sn500-nvme-250gb-ssd-review_013

 

The weak random read performance is difficult to overcome in the mixed test with 70% reads. At lower queue depths, the SN500 is in line with the other mainstream NVMe SSDs on the chart.

WD Blue SN500 250GB NVMe Internal SSD (WDS250G1B0C)

Today Yesterday 7 days ago 30 days ago
$54.99 - -
Buy

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.


Related Tags