Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,066 Reviews & Articles | 60,764 News Posts

ADATA XPG SX8200 240GB & 480GB M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD Review

By: Jon Coulter | m.2 SSDs in Storage | Posted: May 29, 2018 3:00 pm
TweakTown Rating: 99%Manufacturer: ADATA

Iometer - Maximum IOPS

 

Version and / or Patch Used: Iometer 2014

 

We use Iometer to measure high queue depth performance. (No Partition)

 

Max IOPS Read

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_48

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_49

 

 

Max IOPS Write

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_50

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_51

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_52

 

We test NVMe SSDs using eight threads at QD32, or QD256. We do this because we want to see what the drive can generate at its maximum attainable queue depth. We have no problem exceeding factory max random IOPS specs.

 

 

 

Iometer - Disk Response

 

Version and / or Patch Used: Iometer 2014

 

We use Iometer to measure disk response times. Disk response times are measured at an industry accepted standard of 4K QD1 for both write and read. Each test runs twice for 30 seconds consecutively, with a 5-second ramp-up before each test. We partition the drive/array as a secondary device for this testing.

 

Avg. Write Response

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_53

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_54

 

 

Avg. Read Response

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_55

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_56

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_57

 

More lab records for TLC-based SSDs are served up by the SX8200. The SX8200 delivers by-far the best random read response at QD1 for a TLC-based SSD. Where it really matters, is where the SX8200 really delivers. This is another demonstration of why we like IMFT 64-layer flash so much.

 

 

DiskBench - Transfer Rate

 

Version and / or Patch Used: 2.6.2.0

 

We use DiskBench to time a 28.6GB block (9,882 files in 1,247 folders) composed primarily of incompressible sequential and random data as it's transferred from our Toshiba RD400 1TB NVME SSD to our test drive. We then read from a 6GB zip file that's part of our 28.6GB data block to determine the test drive's read transfer rate. Our system is restarted prior to the read test to clear any cached data, ensuring an accurate test result.

 

 

Write Transfer Rate

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_58

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_59

 

 

Read Transfer Rate

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_60

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_61

 

adata-xpg-sx8200-240gb-480gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_62

 

Here again, we see that ADATA's recipe is a bit better than Intel's. The 480GB SX8200 delivers more than double the sustained write performance of the 760P. Intel's 760P employs a fixed SLC buffer capacity. ADATA's SX8200 employs a dynamic SLC buffer that can expand its capacity into unused space. This is why the SX8200's write transfer rate is more than double the 760P.

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Related Tags

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!
loading