Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,128 Reviews & Articles | 61,288 News Posts

Samsung 970 EVO 1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD Review

By: Jon Coulter | m.2 SSDs in Storage | Posted: Apr 24, 2018 2:00 pm
TweakTown Rating: 99%Manufacturer: Samsung

Iometer - Maximum IOPS

 

Version and / or Patch Used: Iometer 2014

 

We use Iometer to measure high queue depth performance. (No Partition)

 

 

Max IOPS Read

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_36

 

 

Max IOPS Write

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_37

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_38

 

We test NVMe SSDs using eight threads at QD32 (QD256). We do this because we want to see what the drive can generate at its maximum attainable queue depth.

 

Another lab record goes to the 970 EVO. This time for the highest write IOPS from any flash-based consumer SSD we've tested.

 

 

 

Iometer - Disk Response

 

Version and / or Patch Used: Iometer 2014

 

We use Iometer to measure disk response times. Disk response times are measured at an industry accepted standard of 4K QD1 for both write and read. Each test runs twice for 30 seconds consecutively, with a 5-second ramp-up before each test. We partition the drive/array as a secondary device for this testing.

 

 

Avg. Write Response

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_39

 

 

Avg. Read Response

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_40

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_41

 

The 970 EVO displays significantly better-read response than its main competitor the SanDisk Extreme Pro/WD Black. The SanDisk Extreme Pro does deliver by far the best write response we've seen from any SSD including Optane, but read response is more important. Plextor's M9Pe delivers the best-read response we've seen from any TLC SSD and remains lab champion in that category.

 

 

DiskBench - Transfer Rate

 

Version and / or Patch Used: 2.6.2.0

 

We use DiskBench to time a 28.6GB block (9,882 files in 1,247 folders) composed primarily of incompressible sequential and random data as it's transferred from our Toshiba RD400 1TB NVME SSD to our test drive. We then read from a 6GB zip file that's part of our 28.6GB data block to determine the test drive's read transfer rate. Our system is restarted prior to the read test to clear any cached data, ensuring an accurate test result. We consider write transfers to be more important than read transfers.

 

 

Write Transfer Rate

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_42

 

 

Read Transfer Rate

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_43

 

samsung-970-evo-1tb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_44

 

We recently upgraded our test system to Windows 10 build 14393. With that upgrade, write transfer rates almost doubled. The reason for this, as far as we know, is that CPU power switching modes have been relaxed on the latest version of Windows 10. We included the NVMe drives we've tested to date on this build of Windows 10. If you needed a good reason to upgrade to a newer version of Windows 10; this is a good reason.

 

Another lab record falls to the 1TB 970 EVO. Samsung's 970 EVO delivers the highest write transfer rate for any consumer SSD we've ever tested, including the mighty MLC powered Samsung 960 Pro 2TB.

    PRICING: You can find the product discussed for sale below. The prices listed are valid at the time of writing, but can change at any time. Click the link below to see real-time pricing for the best deal:

     

    United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon`s website.

    United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK`s website.

    Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada`s website.

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Related Tags

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!
loading