Page 11 [Performance Analysis]
Another review, another custom GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. I promised at the start of the review I wouldn't spend so much time talking about the performance of the card because all GTX 1080 Ti cards are so similar, and I will keep that promise.
Comparing the ASUS ROG Poseidon GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Platinum against NVIDIA's own GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition, and we have a card that performs 10% or more faster in all resolutions, and even more with some tweaking to both the GPU/VRAM clock speeds and in-game detail settings.
Rise of the Tomb Raider runs at 118FPS average at 1440p, which is more than enough to enjoy a perfectly smooth ROTTR experience on a 120Hz, heck even a 144/165Hz G-Sync gaming display if you dropped a couple of details to reach closer to 144/165FPS.
Even Shadow of Mordor runs at 144FPS average at 2560x1440 on the Ultra preset, which is perfect for gaming displays at 144Hz. Amazing performance, but again nothing that beats out the other custom GTX 1080 Ti graphics cards thanks to the invisible voltage wall by Pascal on GP102.
I feel like GeForce GTX 1080 Ti cards fall into three distinct categories for gamers and consumers: 1440p, 3440x1440, or 4K gamers. I don't see many people buying a GTX 1080 Ti for 1080p gaming, so I'm only talking about the 1440p and 4K gaming performance here.
In saying that, we still have a huge 104FPS average in Rise of the Tomb Raider at 3440x1440 on the Ultra preset, which is some amazing performance. Comparing this against the GTX 1080 with 77FPS, and the GTX 1080 Ti with 97FPS, ASUS is ahead by 7FPS which isn't bad at all.
Shadow of Mordor ran buttery smooth at 120FPS at 3440x1440, an incredible result. It was super smooth, once again perfect for the 3440x1440 gaming monitors with a 100Hz refresh rate and G-Sync, like the ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q.
4K isn't going to slow down a card like the ASUS ROG Poseidon GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Platinum, throwing out 71FPS average in Rise of the Tomb Raider. It might only be 3FPS more than the GTX 1080 Ti FE, but it's a huge 21FPS ahead of AMD's new Radeon RX Vega 64 LCE graphics card, the best from Team Red.
The performance in Shadow of Mordor continues to impress, with the memory intensive game hitting 88FPS average, compared to 89FPS average on the GTX 1080 Ti FE. But it thrashes the RX Vega 64 LCE and its 67FPS average.
PRICING: You can find the product discussed for sale below. The prices listed are valid at the time of writing, but can change at any time. Click the link below to see real-time pricing for the best deal:
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon`s website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK`s website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada`s website.
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Scooby-Doo's 'Shaggy' added to JUMP FORCE roster by modder
- Super Smash Bros. Ultimate 'Joker' stage title 'Mementos'
- Guild Wars 2 developers prep for lay-offs and restructuring
- Nintendo Switch could feature Xbox Games Pass by end of 2019
- Did Blizzard just tease the 30th hero for Overwatch?
- MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GAMING X & VENTUS XS Review
- Intrusive Ads on Tweaktown
- AxE: Alliance vs Empire preview: MMO mobile chaos
- random shutdown
- Kensington LD5400T Thunderbolt 3 Dock Review
- Realms of Arkania - Star Trail available for Xbox One
- Death Mark Coming Soon to Terrify Players on Steam
- The Way Remastered Reaches Top of Nintendo eShop EU Charts
- Batman: Arkham City for macOS updated to 64-bit
- Drop into TERA x PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS Collaboration on March 5