Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,398 Reviews & Articles | 64,169 News Posts

MSI X299 XPOWER GAMING AC Motherboard Review (Page 8)

By Steven Bassiri from Sep 27, 2017 @ 9:50 CDT
TweakTown Rating: 92%Manufacturer: MSI

CPU, Memory, and System Benchmarks

CINEBENCH R15

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_70

wPrime

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_71

AIDA64 FPU

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_72

AIDA64 Memory

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_73

ScienceMark

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_74

HandBrake

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_75

SuperPi 32M

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_76

3DMark: Fire Strike

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_77

3DMark: Cloud Gate

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_78

ResidentEvil 6

msi-x299-xpower-gaming-ac-motherboard-review_79

MSI's performance with the X299 XPOWER GAMING AC is well-rounded. Not only does the board use the new microcode that supports Intel's HCC 18Core CPU, but it also seems to have had its memory returned at default to favor latency over bandwidth as we can see in AIDA64 memory and ScienceMark memory results (Science Mark has it in the lead while AIDA doesn't). I should also mention that once you enable XMP that difference should become null.

AIDA64 FLOPS performance is due to updates in the software itself. I do not put too much credence into benchmarking the CPU or GPU to see how well the motherboard does, as the difference is usually within the margin of error. These tests are to make sure performance is not below that margin, or to see what is going on if it's above.

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.


Related Tags