Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,418 Reviews & Articles | 64,434 News Posts

TeamGroup T-Force Cardea 240GB M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD Review (Page 7)

By Jon Coulter from Jul 13, 2017 @ 11:41 CDT
TweakTown Rating: 93%Manufacturer: TeamGroup

Iometer – Maximum IOPS

Version and / or Patch Used: Iometer 2014

We use Iometer to measure high queue depth performance. (No Partition)

Max IOPS Read

teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_46
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_47

Max IOPS Write

teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_48
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_49
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_50

We test NVMe SSDs using eight threads at QD32, or QD256. We do this because we want to see what the drive can generate at its maximum attainable queue depth. Maximum random read performance is similar between the two platforms.

Iometer – Disk Response

Version and / or Patch Used: Iometer 2014

We use Iometer to measure disk response times. Disk response times are measured at an industry accepted standard of 4K QD1 for both write and read. Each test runs twice for 30 seconds consecutively, with a 5-second ramp-up before each test. We partition the drive/array as a secondary device for this testing.

Avg. Write Response

teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_51
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_52

Avg. Read Response

teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_53
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_54
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_55

Disk response is significantly better (lower) on our Intel platform.

DiskBench – Transfer Rate

Version and / or Patch Used: 2.6.2.0

We use DiskBench to time a 28.6GB block (9,882 files in 1,247 folders) composed primarily of incompressible sequential and random data as it's transferred from our Toshiba RD400 1TB NVME SSD to our test drive. We then read from a 6GB zip file that's part of our 28.6GB data block to determine the test drive's read transfer rate. Our system is restarted prior to the read test to clear any cached data, ensuring an accurate test result.

Write Transfer Rate

teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_56
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_57

Read Transfer Rate

teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_58
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_59
teamgroup-force-cardea-240gb-2-nvme-pcie-ssd-review_60

We recently upgraded our test system to Windows 10 build 14393. With that upgrade, write transfer rates almost doubled. The reason for this, as far as we know, is that CPU power switching modes have been relaxed on the latest version of Windows 10. We included the NVMe drives we've tested to date on this build of Windows 10. If you needed a good reason to upgrade to a newer version of Windows 10; this is a good reason.

The Cardea on our Intel platform trades blows with the E7 powered BPX. The Cardea delivers a significantly better read transfer rate and just gets edged out by the BPX's write transfer rate. Compared with Plextor's M8Pe, which is in the same capacity class, the Cardea is the clear winner.

PRICING: You can find the product discussed for sale below. The prices listed are valid at the time of writing, but can change at any time. Click the link below to see real-time pricing for the best deal:

United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at the Amazon website.

United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at the Amazon UK website.

Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at the Amazon Canada website.

We openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond.

Related Tags