Technology and gaming content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,544 Reviews & Articles | 59,990 News Posts

Intel Core i9 9900K/KF Overclocking Guide (Page 5)

Steven Bassiri | Oct 17, 2019 at 03:49 pm CDT - 3 mins, 31 secs reading time for this page

Intel Max Voltages Stability Testing

There are only two things you can do to help stabilize higher clocks. The first is to raise voltages, and the second is to improve cooling. Improving cooling is the best method to increase clocks and stability, as it only helps. Improving cooling is difficult and costs money, but increasing voltages is free. However, increasing voltage can also increase instability as the added heat and heat noise can affect stability. It's a double edged sword.

You can delid your CPU, use a custom water cooling loop, change thermal interface material, and even go sub-zero. You might find that reducing voltages lowers CPU temperature enough, so something like 1.3v could be stable while 1.4v would cause instability at the same frequency because of the added heat.

Intel Core i9 9900K/KF Overclocking Guide 13 | TweakTown.com

Intel recommends a maximum operating voltage of 1.52v VCore, but that's just way too high. I don't know of any watercooler that could cool down a CPU being fed 1.52v, but of course, that figure from Intel doesn't account for LLC since it's not part of Intel default specifications. I recommend 1.45v as maximum VCore with non-subzero cooling, but that doesn't matter since you will probably hit a thermal limit before you hit that voltage limit. The VCCSA (System Agent) is 1.05v stock, and the VCCIO (System IO) is rated 0.95v stock.

Even though Intel says maximum VCCSA can be 1.52v (which is a new addition to the 8th/9th generation datasheet) I recommend no more than 1.35v on either VCCSA not VCCIO. I honestly wouldn't run much more than 1.25v for 24/7 use. If you hit an issue with DRAM overclocking, try many different levels from 1.1 to 1.35v. I have seen memory controllers that don't like anything over 1.25v, so try increasing VCCSA first and then VCCIO, and it's fine if they are different levels.

Intel Core i9 9900K/KF Overclocking Guide 14 | TweakTown.com

Here is our 9900K chiming in at 5.2GHz with a 0-AVX offset, which when combined with Handbrake, which uses AVX, produces a pretty heavy load. For Prime95 testing we did after we did use an offset of two, because Prime95 is much more stressful. However, it's easy to run Handbrake first to see if the overclock even stands a chance. Blender also has a benchmark, which takes a bit longer than Handbrake, but which should be a heavier load and should be more indicative of overall stability. In the end Prime95 is what you will need to use to get the most out of your CPU

Intel Core i9 9900K/KF Overclocking Guide 15 | TweakTown.com

Prime95 has a few different tests you can run. The default test is a blend test, which tests most everything, but isn't going to demolish CPU core instabilities as Small FFTs would. There is some documentation on how to disable AVX use within Prime95 by adding in a string in the local.text file created when the program runs, but from my testing, that method didn't work.

AIDA64 also has a built-in test, and you can choose what you test (core, FPU, etc.) but I would increase the amount of RAM used in that test as the default value is a bit low. AIDA64 is considered a "safe" test by many, as it's not designed to beat your CPU up, but many believe you can't become a man until you get a really good beating. When you run Prime95 keep an eye on temperatures, as you can see I am in the danger zone (80-90C) already with only 1.3v and 5GHz (5.2GHz with -2 AVX offset)

Intel Core i9 9900K/KF Overclocking Guide 16 | TweakTown.com

If your CPU is thermal throttling you can use the new TJmax offset setting added to the 9900K, which will allow you to increase throttle point. Some suggest adding 15C, but we think it's a bit unsafe to use this offset to that extent. The good thing about Handbrake is that it spits out an average work encode speed in FPS, so you can gauge if your performance is increasing or not.

Overall, overclocking the 9900K is quite easy, but you should keep in mind that overclocking can degrade your CPU faster than naturally intended, but most enthusiasts would agree with the long lifespan of modern CPUs and the overall feeling of accomplishment make it worth it.

Last updated: Oct 18, 2019 at 06:11 am CDT

Buy at Amazon

Intel Core i9-9900KF Desktop Processor

TodayYesterday7 days ago30 days ago
Buy at Amazon
$489.00$479.99$562.39
* Prices last scanned on 3/31/2020 at 12:35 pm CDT - prices may not be accurate, click links above for the latest price. We may earn an affiliate commission.
Steven Bassiri

ABOUT THE AUTHOR - Steven Bassiri

Steven went from a fledgling forum reader in 2003 to one of the internet's brightest tech stars by 2010. Armed with an information systems degree, a deep understanding of circuitry, and a passion for tech, Steven (handle Sin0822) enjoys sharing his deep knowledge with others. Steven details products down to the component level to highlight seldom explained, and often misunderstood architectures. Steven is also a highly decorated overclocker with several world records.

We openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here. Please contact us if you wish to respond.

Related Tags