Intel Core 2 Duo is here - could it be Intel's day to shine?
Intel Test System
Processor: Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955, Intel Pentium-D 940 and Intel Core 2 CPU's (Supplied by Intel)
Motherboard: Intel 975XBX Reference
Memory: 2x 1GB DDR2-1000 Corsair
Hard Disk: Seagate 7200.9 500GB (Supplied by Seagate)
Graphics Card: nVidia GeForce 7800GT
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2
Drivers: Intel INF 8.0.1.1002 and nVidia ForceWare 91.31
AMD K8 Test System
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ AM2 @ 2.6GHz (260MHz x 10)
Motherboard: MSI K9N Platinum
Memory: 2x 1GB DDR2-1000 Corsair
Hard Disk: Seagate 7200.9 500GB (Supplied by Seagate Australia)
Graphics Card: nVidia GeForce 7800GT
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2
Drivers: nVidia ForceWare 91.31 and nForce 570 9.1
This time around since the Intel 975XBX supports all of the processors we want to use we have chosen this board as our Intel test platform. Luckily we have an AMD Athlon 64 X2 on the AM2 platform and a supporting motherboard, so this is what we have chosen to run against.
We don't have an FX-60 or FX-62 because AMD doesn't have enough processors to send to all media around the world. Instead we had to make do and take a 3800+ and overclock it to 2.6GHz (260MHz x 10). In theory, this turns out 3800+ CPU into something like a 5000+ CPU.
We've benchmarked the Core architecture before but this time we test in our own labs and have more time with the processors. Is it Intel's day to shine and take back the CPU performance crown from AMD? Let's find out now!
SiSoft Sandra
Version and / or Patch Used: 2007
Developer Homepage: http://www.sisoftware.co.uk
Product Homepage: http://sisoftware.jaggedonline.com/index.php?location=home&a=TTA&lang=en

SiSoft Sandra (System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is a synthetic Windows benchmark that features different tests used to evaluate different PC subsystems.



In our CPU raw performance benchmark we see that the Core 2 does fall behind Netburst's raw FPU and ALU results - this is likely because of the double speed ALU's that this CPU incorporates.
Memory wise its up on the mark against the Netburst but falls back on AMD due to a on die memory controller used by AMD. Intel still relied on the chipset to support its memory controllers and requires the FSB for CPU to memory communication.
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Activision cut jobs to focus on monetization as well as dev
- Anthem's epic skins cost $8.50 a piece
- Crackdown 3 only exists to sell Game Pass subscriptions
- Apex Legends turning their son transsexual, says parents
- Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice Switch, motion control support
Forum Activity
- GeIL Super Luce RGB Sync DDR4-3200 16GB Memory Kit Review
- ASRock Multi-Gigabit Performance: 10GbE/5GbE/2.5G Networking
- Very odd boot behavior on three identical x399 Taichi builds.
- G.Skill TridentZ Royal 4000MHz 32GB Memory Kit Review
- Asrock A97x Killer and Evga 980TI help
Press Releases
- New Screenshots for ShaRkPG, Maneater | PC Version to Support NVIDIA Ansel Technology
- The world's first judicial friendship simulator takes to Kickstarter in Supreme Courtship!
- Cupid hits Ring of Elysium with Valentine's Day event
- New Gameplay Video for World-Shaping RTS Bannermen Released
- Nokia launches Cognitive Collaboration Hubs to help operators design 5G networks and create AI-enabled use cases