Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,097 Reviews & Articles | 60,996 News Posts

HP EX920 SSD Review - Mainstream Perfection

By: Chris Ramseyer | SSDs in Storage | Posted: Oct 18, 2018 3:00 pm

256GB Class Performance Testing

 

Product Comparison

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_302

 

The margin between the most expensive and least expensive 256GB class SSDs is so small that users should only look at the fastest drives available when shopping. These drives have a quarter the number of die compared to the 1TB models, and the write performance can get dicey here due to limited parallelism. It's possible to see SATA SSDs with more write performance than some of the drives, but the read performance over PCI Express is impossible to beat with the older 6Gbps interface.

 

 

Sequential Read Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_077

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_078

 

Starting out with the sequential read test, the 256GB EX920 and SX8200 show identical performance through the QD range. The Intel SSD 760p and Samsung 970 EVO are close to the two other drives with the EVO taking some wins at different queue depths.

 

Sequential Write Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_079

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_080

 

The 256GB EX920 has a very linier burst sequential write that doesn't seem affected by simple queue depth increases.

 

Sustained Sequential Write Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_081

 

We see the same sustained write performance from the different architectures as we spotted with the larger drives. The EX920 doesn't have large cache that the SX8200 has, but gives users more space for data.

 

Random Read Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_082

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_083

 

With the 256GB class, we see the low queue depth random read performance regress from what the large capacity drives give. The EX920 still performs very well in this test, but you can't expect the application performance to be the same across the capacities.

 

Random Write Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_084

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_085

 

We expected to see some of the 256GB drives to have a difficult time with the random write test, but the SLC buffers work to keep the performance high.

 

70% Read Sequential Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_086

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_087

 

The sequential mixed workload performance is down from the larger models but the issue spans all NVMe SSDs.

 

70% Read Random Performance

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_088

 

hp-ex920-ssd-review-mainstream-perfection_089

 

If you were to go back in time and look at older SSDs, you would see that just a few years ago 10,000 random mixed IOPS was a very good result. NVMe and the new flash has raised the bar very high. The EX920 has the highest recorded QD2 random mixed performance we've tested with a 256GB flash-based SSD.

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Related Tags

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!
loading