Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
8,225 Reviews & Articles | 62,325 News Posts

The RAID 0 SSD Report - Intel vs. RunCore

By: Chris Ramseyer | RAID in Storage | Posted: May 7, 2009 6:08 am

Test System


Processors: AMD Opteron 2356 (2.3GHz Quad-Core) x2


Motherboard: Tyan S2915-E (Supplied by Tyan)


Memory: Kingston KVR667D2S4P5/2G x4 (Supplied by Kingston)


Graphics Card: XFX 8800 GTX (Supplied by XFX USA)


Enclosure: Lian Li V2000


Cooling: Noctua NH-U12DO (Supplied by Noctua)


SATA Controller: Areca ARC-1231ML (Supplied by Areca)


SAS Controller: Areca ARC-1680i (Supplied by Areca)


Operating System: Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate X64


The Areca 1231ML RAID controller will be handling the arrays for both the Intel / Kingston X25-M and RunCore Pro IV arrays. When it comes to capacity the RunCore setup has a distinct advantage over the Intel array, 256GB compared to Intel's 160GB. Things change once inside the OS, though; the Intel drives have a useable 160GB but the RunCore drives once formatted shrink to 240GB.


On the price front Intel has an advantage since they recently lowered the price on their X25-M Series and the RunCore Pro IV drives were just launched. The Intel array has an MSRP of 780 USD while the RunCore Pro IV is 960 USD.


    PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.

    United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.

    United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.

    Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Related Tags

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!