Version and / or Patch Used: 3.05
ATTO is a timeless benchmark used to provide manufacturers with data used for marketing storage products. When evaluating ATTO performance we focus on the drive's performance curve.
Sequential read/write transfers max out at an impressive 3,314/1,949 MB/s. Keep in mind this is our OS volume, and it is filled to 75% of its total capacity. We note the impressive performance at 4K transfers. The highest sequential read performance is achieved at 32MB transfers. The highest sequential write performance is achieved at 2MB transfers.
The 250GB and 1TB EVO's both display superior small-file performance. Both capacities ramp up quickly, essentially reaching full speed at 16KB transfers. In terms of peak performance, the 250GB model is nearly as fast as the 512GB 950 Pro.
Patriot's Hellfire delivers the highest peak performance but does so with an inferior performance curve. The Hellfire is only capable of this kind of sequential write performance when the data is 100% compressible, which is an unrealistic scenario. Overall, the 960 Pro is the winner of this test, followed closely by the 960 EVO 1TB.
Again, the EVO's both ramp up quickly. Both EVO's peak at 512KB transfers with the 1TB model hitting 3,300 MB/s and the 250GB model at 3,200 MB/s. The 960 EVO's performance curve flattens off a bit at 16KB-64KB transfers before picking up steam again and finishing strong.
OCZ's RD400 follows a similar performance pattern to that of the 960 EVO, albeit with less performance. The EVO's at both capacity points meet or exceed Samsung's factory specifications.
Anvil Storage Utilities
Version and / or Patch Used: 1.1.0
Anvil's Storage Utilities is a storage benchmark designed to measure the storage performance of SSDs. The Standard Storage Benchmark performs a series of tests; you can run a full test or just the read or write test, or you can run a single test, i.e. 4K QD16. When evaluating performance with Anvils, we focus on total score.
Anvil's scoring gives a good indication of a drive's overall performance. In terms of overall scoring, the 960 EVO's are only outperformed by Samsung's own 960 Pro. Both capacities easily outperform their predecessor, the 950 Pro, by a huge margin. The 1TB 960 EVO outperforms the 512GB 950 Pro by a whopping 50%. Samsung's 960 Series SSD's have no competition when it comes to Anvil's total scoring due to their massive IOPS capabilities.
(Anvil) Read IOPS through Queue Depth Scale
With our configuration, we attained 382K random read IOPS at QD128. This matches Samsung's factory specification of 380K random read IOPS at QD128. Amazing performance delivered from a 3-bit flash array.
Here we get our first glimpse of 2-bit vs. 3-bit flash performance over the NVMe interface. The 960 Pro and EVO are both Polaris controlled. Essentially, the only difference between the EVO and Pro is the flash, and we can clearly see that over the NVMe interface 2-bit flash clearly outperforms 3-bit in a more pronounced manner than we typically see over SATA.
(Anvil) Write IOPS through Queue Scale
With our configuration, we exceeded the 960 EVO's factory max random write performance specification, doing so at QD64. The 1TB EVO is spec'd at 380K IOPS at QD128 - we are getting 395K at QD64.
At higher queue depths, Samsung's 960 series SSDs deliver a minimum of 2x the performance of the rest of the drives in our test pool. The 1TB 960 EVO sets a new lab record for the highest random write performance in this test. The 1TB EVO even outperforms the 960 Pro in this case due to its Intelligent TurboWrite buffer.
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- Page 1 [Introduction, Drive Specifications, Pricing and Availability]
- Page 2 [Drive Details]
- Page 3 [Test System Setup, & Drive Properties]
- Page 4 [Synthetic Benchmarks - ATTO & Anvil Storage Utilities]
- Page 5 [Synthetic Benchmarks - CrystalDiskMark & AS SSD]
- Page 6 [Benchmarks (OS) - PCMark Vantage, PCMark 7 & PCMark 8]
- Page 7 [Benchmarks (Secondary) - IOPS, Response & Transfer Rate]
- Page 8 [Benchmarks (Secondary Volume) - PCMark 8 Extended]
- Page 9 [Benchmarks (Secondary Volume) - 70/30 Mixed Workload]
- Page 10 [Maxed-Out Performance (MOP)]
- Page 11 [Final Thoughts]
Recommended for You
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Tekken 7 mobile game to feature microtransactions galore
- Bitcoin reaches record high pricing of $4500
- Ethereum difficulty squeezing out the small miners
- Destiny 2's day one update already confirmed
- Quake Champions frags itself into Early Access on Aug 22
- Aerocool Project 7 P7-C1 Pro Mid-Tower Chassis Review
- ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC5300 Wireless Gaming Router Review
- corsair vengeance lpx 16gb ddr4-2400 problem on asus x370 pro motherboard
- Synology DS1817 8-Bay NAS (Tested at 10Gbps) Review
- ASRock X399 Taichi Threadripper TR4 Motherboard Review
- Optimize system performance with new drive adapter
- Lian Li reveals new PC-Q39 tempered glass Mini-ITX tower
- Longsys' world-first 11.5x13mm NVMe BGA SSD drives new mobile user experience
- Thermaltake attends NVIDIA Gamer Connect
- ASRock introduces the X10 IoT router for smart homes