When we look at Futuremark benchmarking utilities, we have several to choose from. I used several of them since they are freely available on the Net and can easily be run with most current system specifications. Tests will be run at normal default settings unless otherwise noted. AA/AF will be turned off in the video display properties so they won't be a factor in this series of tests.
For the sake of clarification, I use the formal company name of MadOnion for the first test since that is what they were still called when they created the 3DMark2001 utility. They changed their name to Futuremark before the next revision came out, but the two companies are in essence the same.
3DMark2001 SE is a part of the popular 3DMark series. By combining DirectX 8.1 support with completely new graphics (including the GeForce4), it continues to provide benchmark results that empower you to make informed hardware assessments.
3DMark03 is the latest version of the highly favored 3DMark series. By combining full DirectX9.0 support with completely new tests and graphics, 3DMark03 continues the legacy of being industry standard benchmark.
PCMark2004 is a multipurpose benchmark, suited for benchmarking all kinds of PCs, from laptops to workstations, as well as across multiple Windows operating systems. This easy-to-use benchmark makes professional strength benchmarking software available even to novice users. PCMark04 consists of a series of tests that represent common tasks in home and office programs. PCMark04 also covers many additional areas outside the scope of other Futuremark benchmarks.
Yes, I know, I'm still being a little on the lazy side and batching the Futuremark tests together. I prefer to do it this way, however, since it shows all vital information without adding extra pages to the review.
Beginning with the 3DMark series of tests, we see a bit of disparity between the two tests. This was pretty much expected, though, since the "03" version was rumored from the beginning to be graphics card driven instead of being an accurate assessment of total system performance. We have included the test anyway since many like to see where the results lead. Take it for what it's worth, but I don't put a lot of faith in the thing.
That said, we see a very impressive gain when testing the systems under 3DMark2001. Considering that both systems are identical with the exception of the processor and mainboard, we've managed to show a very nice 35% increase in scores. Not too shabby at all! The 3DMark03 scores only managed to garner a 9% performance increase, but again, I personally don't put a lot of stock in this particular test.
Moving on to the PCMark portion of the test shows again some decent increases in the performance numbers. Since PCMark uses several different tests, many of which use commonly used activities such as video compression and audio converting, we get to see a synthetic test of more non-gaming type functions. Our results showed a 14% increase in overall score and a 15% improvement in CPU scores. Also included was a set of memory tests since the memory controller is built directly into the processor of the Athlon FX processor being tested. Remember, the memory modules used were the same in both test systems. If you can do the math, the result comes out to a very impressive 80% increase in memory scores for the new kid on the block. Sweet!
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- AMD FX-53 - Page 1 [Introduction]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 2 [The Processor]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 3 [Benchmarks - Test System Setups]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 4 [Benchmarks - SiSoft Sandra 2004]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 5 [Benchmarks - MadOnion/Futuremark]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 6 [Benchmarks - AquaMark3]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 7 [Benchmarks - Super PI]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 8 [Benchmarks - Quake III Arena]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 9 [Benchmarks - UT 2004]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 10 [Benchmarks - Doom 3]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 11 [Conclusion]
Recommended for You
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Full PC with AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper starts at just $1699
- AMD Ryzen 5 2500U spotted, new APU rocks Vega GPU tech
- AMD Radeon RX Vega could be priced at up to $850
- Ryzen ThreadRipper delidded: half its CPU dies disabled
- EA made more on live services than games in Q1'17
- Asrock A88M-G/3.1 + A10-7860K = freezes in the idle state
- ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3G: Mid-Range On The Cheap
- AMD Ryzen 3 1300X and Ryzen 3 1200 CPU Review
- Lian-Li PC-O5SW...Watercooling and dimensions
- Toshiba XG5 1TB OEM M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD Review
- Toshiba introduces TR200 SATA retail SSD series with 64-layer 3D flash memory
- Need for Speed Payback takes cars from scrap to stock to supercar in new trailer
- Visbit releases Unity SDK and web VR player for its all-in-one VR streaming service, bringing high quality VR streaming to the masses
- GWENT Gamescom 2017 tournament announced
- Toshiba NVMe SSDs now available with Lenovo's new ThinkSystem and ThinkAgile servers