When we look at Futuremark benchmarking utilities, we have several to choose from. I used several of them since they are freely available on the Net and can easily be run with most current system specifications. Tests will be run at normal default settings unless otherwise noted. AA/AF will be turned off in the video display properties so they won't be a factor in this series of tests.
For the sake of clarification, I use the formal company name of MadOnion for the first test since that is what they were still called when they created the 3DMark2001 utility. They changed their name to Futuremark before the next revision came out, but the two companies are in essence the same.
3DMark2001 SE is a part of the popular 3DMark series. By combining DirectX 8.1 support with completely new graphics (including the GeForce4), it continues to provide benchmark results that empower you to make informed hardware assessments.
3DMark03 is the latest version of the highly favored 3DMark series. By combining full DirectX9.0 support with completely new tests and graphics, 3DMark03 continues the legacy of being industry standard benchmark.
PCMark2004 is a multipurpose benchmark, suited for benchmarking all kinds of PCs, from laptops to workstations, as well as across multiple Windows operating systems. This easy-to-use benchmark makes professional strength benchmarking software available even to novice users. PCMark04 consists of a series of tests that represent common tasks in home and office programs. PCMark04 also covers many additional areas outside the scope of other Futuremark benchmarks.
Yes, I know, I'm still being a little on the lazy side and batching the Futuremark tests together. I prefer to do it this way, however, since it shows all vital information without adding extra pages to the review.
Beginning with the 3DMark series of tests, we see a bit of disparity between the two tests. This was pretty much expected, though, since the "03" version was rumored from the beginning to be graphics card driven instead of being an accurate assessment of total system performance. We have included the test anyway since many like to see where the results lead. Take it for what it's worth, but I don't put a lot of faith in the thing.
That said, we see a very impressive gain when testing the systems under 3DMark2001. Considering that both systems are identical with the exception of the processor and mainboard, we've managed to show a very nice 35% increase in scores. Not too shabby at all! The 3DMark03 scores only managed to garner a 9% performance increase, but again, I personally don't put a lot of stock in this particular test.
Moving on to the PCMark portion of the test shows again some decent increases in the performance numbers. Since PCMark uses several different tests, many of which use commonly used activities such as video compression and audio converting, we get to see a synthetic test of more non-gaming type functions. Our results showed a 14% increase in overall score and a 15% improvement in CPU scores. Also included was a set of memory tests since the memory controller is built directly into the processor of the Athlon FX processor being tested. Remember, the memory modules used were the same in both test systems. If you can do the math, the result comes out to a very impressive 80% increase in memory scores for the new kid on the block. Sweet!
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- AMD FX-53 - Page 1 [Introduction]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 2 [The Processor]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 3 [Benchmarks - Test System Setups]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 4 [Benchmarks - SiSoft Sandra 2004]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 5 [Benchmarks - MadOnion/Futuremark]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 6 [Benchmarks - AquaMark3]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 7 [Benchmarks - Super PI]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 8 [Benchmarks - Quake III Arena]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 9 [Benchmarks - UT 2004]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 10 [Benchmarks - Doom 3]
- AMD FX-53 - Page 11 [Conclusion]
Recommended for You
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- For Honor PC requirements revealed
- Take a closer look at the Xbox One's 28nm APU die
- New images of the upcoming LG G6 leaked
- COD: Infinite Warfare - best-selling game of 2016 in US
- The entire gaming market slumped 12% in the US last year
- Black screen GA Z170X ULTRA GAMING BIOS F21 I7 6400 T HELP
- hp printer technical support
- How to prevent pc from waking up from sleep when a brown out occurs?
- Z170MX-Gaming 5 + i5 7600k.. Should work or not?
- ASRock 2.70 Splash Screen replaces Windows?
- Transcend reveals industrial-grade SuperMLC JetFlash 740 USB flash drive for exceptional performance and endurance
- Light up your gaming with BIOSTAR B250 motherboard series
- MSI the pioneer in VR Gaming crowns winners of VR JAM
- NGE and Twitch partner to bring the Overwatch Winter Premiere Live Finals to PAX Arena at PAX South
- Bayview Labs, Seraph Group and MIT Game Lab announce 'Play Labs' VR/AR/AI Playful Tech Accelerator for MIT students and alumni