TweakTown
Tech content trusted by users in North America and around the world
5,676 Reviews & Articles | 36,078 News Posts
Weekly Giveaway: Fractal Design Arc Cases Contest (Global Entry!)

Comay BladeDrive G24 480GB PCIe SSD Review - World Exclusive - Benchmarks - Anvil Storage Utilities

Comay BladeDrive G24 480GB PCIe SSD Review - World Exclusive

Today Chris takes an exclusive look at the Comay BladeDrive G24 and defines a new product category. Are All-in-One RAID products right for you?

| PCIe in Storage | Posted: Jan 6, 2014 7:29 pm
TweakTown Rating: 94%      Manufacturer: Corerise

Anvil Storage Utilities

 

Version and / or Patch Used: RC6

 

So what is Anvil Storage Utilities? First of all, it's a storage benchmark for SSDs and HDDs where you can check and monitor your performance. The Standard Storage Benchmark performs a series of tests, you can run a full test, or just the read or the write test, or you can run a single test (i.e. 4K DQ16).

 

Anvil Storage Utilities is not officially available yet, but we've been playing with the beta for several months now. The author, Anvil, has been steadily updating the software on several international forums, and is adding new features every couple of months.

 

The software is used several different ways, and to show different aspects for each drive. We've chosen to use this software to show the performance of a drive with two different data sets. The first is with compressible data, and the second data set is incompressible data. Several users have requested this data in our SSD reviews.

 

0-Fill Compressible Data

 

TweakTown image content/5/9/5990_57_comay_bladedrive_g24_480gb_pcie_ssd_review_world_exclusive.png

 

Incompressible Data

 

TweakTown image content/5/9/5990_58_comay_bladedrive_g24_480gb_pcie_ssd_review_world_exclusive.png

 

The SF-2281 architecture used means incompressible data transfers slower than compressible data.

 

Read IOPS through Queue Depth Scale

 

TweakTown image content/5/9/5990_59_comay_bladedrive_g24_480gb_pcie_ssd_review_world_exclusive.png

 

Earlier in the review, we stated that the BladeDrive might not be the best option for some gamers, and this is why. The low queue depth performance is a little lower than Samsung's 840 EVO, and very close to some of the other offerings on the market. It's a lot of money to spend if you don't have the means to use it, and by that I mean the software that can really scale or a set of tasks that can ramp up the queue depth. In our chart we stopped at QD32, but in our QD64 test, the BladeDrive scored nearly 200K IOPS.

 

Scaling Write IOPS through Queue Scale

 

TweakTown image content/5/9/5990_60_comay_bladedrive_g24_480gb_pcie_ssd_review_world_exclusive.png

 

Looking at the write IOPS, we see the BladeDrive staying more competitive with the other low queue depth performers, and it still does amazing at high queue depths. The chart stops at QD32, but at QD64 we achieved just over 250K IOPS.

Related Tags

Further Reading: Read and find more Storage content at our Storage reviews, guides and articles index page.

Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Post a Comment about this content

Latest Tech News Posts

View More News Posts

Latest Downloads

View More Latest Downloads

TweakTown Web Poll

Question: Did EA kill the Battlefield franchise with the terrible BF4 issues?

Yes, Battlefield is doomed

No, Battlefield will live on strong

I'm not sure, but I know EA needs to improve its game

or View the Results

View More Polls

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Press Releases

View More Press Releases
Get TweakTown updates via Facebook!
Just click the "Like" button below