SATA RAID Comparison
We thought it would be a good and interesting idea to include SATA RAID benchmarks results from VIA's new VT8237 Southbridge (which can also be found on VIA KT600 based AMD Athlon motherboards, not just PT800 based motherboards) compared to VIA's biggest competitor - Intel - with their ICH5R Southbridge on an EPoX Canterwood retail based motherboard with two Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 160GB hard disk drives that contain 8MB cache since these are currently among the fastest SATA hard disk drives money can buy.
We will test with HD Tach which will serve as a good gauge as to how VIA's IDE performance matches up against Intel since we have seen very little to no coverage of this topic posted in any PT800 online reviews to date.
We used the same CPU, memory and RAID settings (RAID 0 and stripe size 64k) to compare both RAID controllers from VIA and Intel to even the playing field out as much as possible, so without further ado let's get into the all important benchmarks.
HD Tach 2.61 Results
- VIA VT8237 SATA RAID Controller Results
- Intel ICH5R SATA RAID Controller Results
As far as read and write speeds go as you can see from the screenshots above that both VT8237 and ICH5R Southbridge's are almost identical with Intel beating out VIA in average read tests and with VIA beating out Intel in average write tests by almost the same respective margins with access times being exactly the same, as we expected, since chipsets have no influence over this figure at all.
It should be taken into consideration that the Intel ICH5R was able to write 9MB/s quicker than VIA VT8237 but this was purely the highest speed recorded through HD Tach and not sustained which makes this result not very important to us. As far as burst speeds go, the burst speed for the VIA VT8237 was 101596kps (101MB/s or thereabouts) and the burst speed for the Intel ICH5R was 123429kps (123MB/s or thereabouts) giving Intel a 22MB/s lead in this area of testing.
Since we have very little performance difference in average read and write speeds, we need to look at the next best thing, if you want to call it that - CPU utilization. The Intel ICH5R uses many more CPU cycles than the VIA VT8237 to perform the same task - VIA beat Intel in this category by 3.2% CPU utilization which is almost 7 times better than what Intel have managed with their newest Southbridge. All this basically means is that when you are copying large amounts of data, the CPU does less work to perform the task which leaves more CPU power to perform tasks that you are doing when the hard drive is being accessed heavily. In real world terms, this makes a big difference when you have many programs open when the hard drive is getting a work out - you will be able to continue work as usual without being lagged down.
Overall, the first prize for IDE performance must be given to VIA for its low CPU utilization results which are very impressive. Maybe the Intel ICH5R CPU utilization is higher because it bursts at a higher rate than VIA and can obtain a quicker maximum write speed; this would explain it at least but we cannot be sure of this.
(This section by Cameron Wilmot)
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Australia: Find other tech and computer products like this over at PLE Computer's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 1 [Introduction]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 2 [Pentium 4's newest companion and Key Features]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 3 [PT800 / VT8237 in Detail]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 4 [V RAID - Windows Tool Software]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 5 [V RAID - SATA RAID Comparison]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 6 [Reference PT800 Photos]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 7 [Test Setup and SiSoft Sandra]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 8 [Benchmarks - PCMark 2002]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 9 [Benchmarks - 3DMark 2001]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 10 [Benchmarks - 3DMark 2003]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 11 [Benchmarks - Code Creatures]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 12 [Benchmarks - Comanche 4]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 13 [Benchmarks - Unreal Tournament 2003]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 14 [Benchmarks - Quake 3]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 15 [Benchmarks - Jedi Knight 2]
- VIA PT800 Chipset - Page 16 [Conclusion]
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Recommended for You
Latest News Posts
- Apple already putting pressure on Fitbit in wearables market
- Charge ALL the Things With a 4-Port USB Hub
- Trying to prevent drones from dropping contraband into prisons is hard
- No Star Wars Battlefront Xbox One bundle, EA confirms
- Razer offers Aussie LoL fans a ticket for worldwide travel
- AMD Radeon R9 Nano Preview - Fiji and HBM Go Under the Shrink Ray
- Win7 wont install on AM1A-M system
- Z77 Extreme6 boot screen displays after hard shutoff/reactivation, does not display after reset
- Razer Leviathan 5.1 Channel Gaming Sound Bar and Sub Review
- ASRock Z97 Extreme4 Fast BOOT Issue
- CYBERTRONPC ANNOUNCES SMALL FORM FACTOR SYSTEM WITH AMD R9 NANO GRAPHICS CARD
- SilverStone Storage Devices - Mobile Series - MS08
- ASRock Z170 OC Formula Sets More Records at IDF 2015 San Francisco!
- ATTO Technology to Display Network and Storage Connectivity Portfolio at VMworld 2015
- SilverStone Accessories - Expansion Cards - ECM20