Tech content trusted by users in North America and around the world
6,410 Reviews & Articles | 42,716 News Posts
TRENDING NOW: 10TB SSDs are on their way thanks to Micron and Intel's new 3D NAND

nVidia GeForce FX 5900 Ultra - Fourth Time Lucky - Conclusion

For many months enthusiasts awaited the arrival of nVidia GeForce FX 5800 only to be let down by poor performance, jet engine level volume from its cooler and supply problems due to the use of DDR-II. nVidia acknowledged the FX 5800 was a failure and have recently released the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra with many improvements over its predecessor. Read on as Cameron "Sov" Johnson tells us if nVidia learned from their mistakes or not.

By: | NVIDIA GeForce GPU in Video Cards | Posted: Jun 11, 2003 4:00 am
TweakTown Rating: 9.0%Manufacturer: nVidia



After letting the entire hardware community down with the FX 5200, 5600 and 5800, these lines were considered to be a total waste of money compared to what was available to the end user, which we here agree with. The mothership of the nVidia line, the FX 5800 Ultra was unable to beat a Radeon 9700 Pro in most benchmarks, let alone the 9800 series. With the price of the FX 5800 being well over $800 AU why would you take the inferior product? You wouldn't.


nVidia have once again shown that with a bit more research, a few good ideas and listening to what people want rather than sticking something in front of them.


After all the troubles that the FX 5800 Ultra had, such as poor memory bandwidth, graphic distortion with FSAA enabled and the ultra high noise curtsey of the horrid cooling solution, the NV35 is defiantly a giant leap in the right direction for nVidia. The fact is that the memory bandwidth of the improved 256-bit memory interface can easily pick up the slack and then some. Now, the FX 5900 is able to outpace the Radeon 9800 Pro in all relevant benchmarks and can reclaim the Ultimate 3D card claim for NVIDIA - for the moment.


While the FX5900 has its good points there are a few drawbacks with the new 3D marvel. First off the PCB is much larger than any previous card from nVidia. This can cause serious space issues in SFF computers, which are the biggest sellers amongst the enthusiast community these days. The larger PCB also costs a considerable amount to produce compared to the relatively small PCB design of the Radeon 9800.


The other major drawback is the size of the cooling. The unit blocks the first PCI slot on most motherboards, reducing you to five or in some cases four PCI slots.


- Pros


Faster than the FX 5800 Ultra


Quieter Cooling solution


Improved FSAA image Quality


Improved Driver support


- Cons


Cost of retail cards to be well over $900AU


Cooling solution blocks PCI slot 1


Rating: 9 out of 10 and TweakTown's Editors Choice



Right of Reply

We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Further Reading: Read and find more Video Cards content at our Video Cards reviews, guides and articles index page.

Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!

Latest News Posts

View More News Posts

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Press Releases

View More Press Releases
Or Scroll Up Or Down