Processor: AMD Athlon XP 1600+
Memory: 512MB OCZ PC3500 DDR RAM (Supplied by Shop4memory)
Video Card: ATi 9700 Pro (Supplied by ATi)
Hard Disk(s): Seagate Barracuda ATA IV 60 GB 7200 RPM
Sound Card(s): Hercules Game Theatre XP
Operating System Used: Windows XP Professional SP1
Drivers Used: ATi Catalyst 2.4
Software Used: MadOnion 3DMark 2001 SE, MadOnion PC Mark 2002, Quake III Arena, Comanche 4, Serious Sam SE, SiSoft Sandra 2003
SiSoft Sandra 2003
*** Buy the Professional upgrade version of Sandra 2003 - Get your own copy here! ***
SiSoft Sandra 2003 is a world renowned benchmark. It can tell you if your system is running on par or not and even compare them to personal benchmarked systems.
In the SiSoft Sandra CPU benchmark, the Shuttle AK37GTR falls behind the FIC AN19E we reviewed earlier last month. There isn't a huge difference though, maybe about 50-100 points in FPU and ALU.
Running at DDR 333, the AK37GTR comes close to the AN19E in the memory benchmark, but no cigar. It falls behind the AN19E again by about 30-50 points. Maybe a BIOS update would help? Also note that this is not the final retail sample, so adjustments might be made to improve performance.
The AK37GTR caught up in the Integer SiSoft 2003 MMX test, only losing by about six points, which is definitely considered "on par". As far as the floating benchmark goes, it falls behind to a 150 point deficit. Perhaps it could be only SiSoft? Maybe the AK37GTR will beat out its counterpart, the AN19E in other tests? Continue to find out!
MadOnion PC Mark 2002
Under the HDD test in the new benchmarking system from MadOnion, PC MARK 2002, the shuttle performs almost right on par with the FIC AN19E. It fell a little behind in the memory test and holds its ground in the CPU test. Still, in all three, the AN19E edged out the AK37GTR by a notch.
MadOnion 3DMark 2001 SE
In 3DMark 2001 SE, the Shuttle AK37GTR gets outdone once again by about 100 points at each resolution. Does the AK37GTR have any juice in it to pump past the AN19E?
My question is answered! The Shuttle AK37GTR finally passes the FIC AN19E at a resolution of 1024 x 768 in both bit rates. Although the lead is only of about 1-2 FPS, it still gives a sign of relief to the AK37GTR.
Even at a higher resolution, the AK37GTR is able to pull another trick out of its hat. It beats out the AN19E by about 1-1.5 FPS at both bit rates (using a resolution of 1280 x 1024).
Serious Sam SE
Serious Sam SE is based on OpenGL, unlike our past two benchmarks. At 1024 x 768, the Shuttle AK37GTR falls behind the AN19E by only a few FPS at both bit rates. Still, to the human eye, no huge difference.
At 1280 x 1024 16-bit in Serious Sam SE, the AK37GTR falls behind the AN19E by 1-2 FPS again. At a higher bit rate, 32-bit, it seems to have almost caught up falling only 0.3 FPS behind the AN19E.
Quake III Arena
Quake III Arena holds the relatively same story we have been seeing for most of our benchmarks, the FIC AN19E coming up with a few more FPS than the Shuttle AK37GTR. At 1024 x 768 at both bit rates, it falls behind by 2-3 FPS.
At 1280 x 1024 at both bit rates, the AK37GTR and AN19E are nose to nose with the AN19E winning by a nose hair.
Both of these boards are based on the KT400 chipset, so performance was expected to be very close. As we saw above, it definitely was. But an FPS is an FPS, and in all our benchmarks except Comanche 4, the Shuttle AK37GTR came a few FPS short of the FIC AN19E.
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 1 [Introduction]
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 2 [Specifications]
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 3 [Packaging]
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 4 [Motherboard]
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 5 [BIOS]
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 6 [Benchmarks]
- Shuttle AK37GTR - Page 7 [Conclusion]
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Battlegrounds' new patch: Early Access beats AAA games
- Corsair's Commander Pro controls all case fans, lighting
- Google's 4K digital whiteboard available for $5000
- Acer's new Predator Z35P: 35-inch 3440x1440 100Hz G-Sync
- Crackdown 3 coming to PC, is an Xbox Play Anywhere title
- C2750D4I won't get passed initializing 55
- Asus active pen (for T303UA)
- Alienware 15 R3 Laptop Storage Performance Investigation
- ASUS RT-AC1900p Wireless Router Review
- ASUS RT-AC1900p Wireless Router Review
- Western Digital sets new standard with latest generation in popular HGST-brand Ultrastar SAS SSD family
- AMD raises expectations for server performance, unveils EPYC processor brand for the datacenter
- HighPoint's SSD7101 PCIe board-sized drive series integrate Samsung 960 NVMe SSDs to deliver groundbreaking performance over 12GB/s
- Micron accelerates all-flash storage speed, performance and value with new flexible petabyte-scale enterprise data center solution
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 and 630 mobile platforms drive advanced photography, enhanced gaming, integrated connectivity and machine learning