Join other TweakTown fans on our Facebook fan page!
Technology content trusted by users in North America and around the world.
Sign up to our newsletterWatch our YouTube channelLike us on FacebookFollow us on Twitter+1 us on Google Plus

4,339 Articles | 23,891 Posts | 76,686 Members
Select Your Edition:USA EditionAU Edition
System
Builders
Guide

REALLY FRESH TECH CONTENT (OUR VERY LATEST STUFF)...

USA EditionYou are located: Home > Reviews > Storage > A-DATA S599 100GB SandForce SF-1200 Solid State Disk

A-DATA S599 100GB SandForce SF-1200 Solid State Disk

By: (more) | Storage Content | Posted: Mar 30, 2010 5:35 am
Click to search for the price of this item!Comment | Print | Email | Font Size: AA
Our Rating: 94% | Manufacturer: A-DATA

 

We would like to thank the following companies for supplying and supporting us with our test system hardware and equipment: Intel, ASUS, Leadtek, Corsair, LSI and Noctua.

 

You can read more about TweakTown's Storage Product Testing Workstation and the procedures followed to test products in this article.

 

Today we are looking at A-DATA's S599 100GB SandForce SF-1200 controlled SSD. This is the first drive we have tested with the new Intel 9.6 Rapid Storage Technology driver. You will see today that the new driver increases the performance of the SandForce SF-1200 controller by a very significant amount in PCMark Vantage (Windows HDD Tests). All of the other drives presented in the chart were tested on either the Marvell SATA 6G controller (Crucial RealSSD C300 SATA 6G results) on the basic Microsoft AHCI driver that fully supports Windows 7's TRIM command. Until the 9.6 RST release, Intel SATA drivers did not support TRIM.

 

There are two points of significance to look for in today's benchmark results. The first has to do with drivers and is between the Corsair F100 and the A-DATA S599. These are the two SandForce SF-1200 drives; one tested with Microsoft base drivers and the other with the new Intel 9.6. This battle is really about the drivers and not so much a true fight between the two. That will come in the next few days.

 

The second comparison is as true as it gets and this is the battle between the A-DATA S599 with RST 9.6 drivers and the Crucial RealSSD C300 running on the Marvell SATA controller. Since the Marvell SATA controller has not been updated, we are seeing the highest level of performance from the drive as is possible at this time. I have learned that the C300 in 128GB capacity is slower than the 256GB model we tested. When making your purchasing decision, you should keep this in mind. We will talk about this more in the conclusion.

 

Over the next two weeks we will be retesting our collection of drives to gather performance data of these products with the RST 9.6 driver and get back to true apples to apples comparisons across the board.

 


ATTO Baseline Performance

 

Version and / or Patch Used: 2.34

 

ATTO is used by many disk manufacturers to determine the read and write speeds that will be presented to customers.

 

 

In ATTO we see a nice progressive wave of performance that shows the drive is running normally. At the bottom of the scale we see that the A-DATA S599 is even faster than what A-DATA has claimed in their marketing literature.

 


Page 5 of 12

Prev

Further Reading: Read and find more Storage content at our Storage reviews, guides and articles index page.

TweakTown RSS FeedDo you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Post a Comment about this content

Related Tags

Content Gallery


Storage News Posts

View More Storage News Posts

TweakTown Web Poll

Question: What new products do you most want to see at Computex 2012?

Audio

Cases, Cooling & PSUs

CPU, APU & Chipsets

Displays

Memory

Mobile Devices and Phones

Motherboards

Peripherals

Storage / SSDs

Ultrabooks and Laptops

Video Cards

Booth Babes

or View the Results

View More Polls

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Storage Press Releases

View More Storage Press Releases