All right... let's find out what this little gem can do now, shall we? We know what we can expect to find in the box, we know what features that it supports, all that's left is to see some hard numbers to compare against. But first, let's take a look at what kind of system it will be running on.
AMD Thunderbird 1000 @ 1333MHz
256MB Crucial PC-133 CAS2 SDRAM
IBM 60GXP 40GB Hard Drive
Hitachi CM814 21" Monitor
VIA 4-in-1 drivers v4.34
nVidia Detonator v12.90
I used the nVidia 12.90 Det3 drivers because the test system has a problem with the 21.xx series drivers. I've been playing with some setups, and it looks like it may be a conflict between the drivers and the KT133A chipset of my motherboard. So to remain fair for the testing, all tests on all cards were performed using the 12.90's
- Default settings
- All tests run
- Default settings
- All tests run
Quake III Arena
- v1.11 with Demo001
Quake III Arena testing was done with these settings:
- GL Extensions: On
- Full Screen: On
- Lighting: Lightmap
- Geometric Detail: Slider bar set to MAX
- Texture Quality: 32 bit
- Texture Filter: Tri-Linear
- All "Eye Candy" enabled
So far so good. Granted, 3dMark2000 is an older benchmarking utility, but it can still show us where the card is strong or weak. From what we can see, there aren't too many weaknesses to be seen. So let's take the testing up a level and see what happens...
The GeForce3 core is beginning to show now. Under the much more graphically intense testing of 3dMark2001, we're seeing that it still whoops the older GeForce2 chipset to pieces. The nearly 2100 point rise in score is strictly due to the newer GPU architecture. And since it is based on the GeForce3 core, it can still run all of the tests included in this utility. Granted, a test suite isn't a reason to spend money on a new video card, but just the fact that it runs all tests lets us know that it is capable of meeting the future demands of game makers.
- Quake III Arena
I still see some close test scores at the lower resolutions to the older GeForce2 chipset, but how many of us really play at that screen size? I know that a MINIMUM resolution for my fragfests is 1024 x 768, and I normally go a bit higher.
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
Recommended for You
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- MSI makes its GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X official
- StarCraft remastered announced by Blizzard
- The first sign of Kaby Lake X: the Intel Core i7-7740K
- AMD Ryzen with 12C/24T appears, excites us all so much
- AMD teases Radeon RX Vega is 'just around the corner'
- New Mobo and my W10 Install?
- Just finished my PC-011 Build
- ASUS M51Vr Notebook. Long story.
- Kong: Skull Island Movie Review
- TPM issue with 970-D3P
- Elgato Stream Deck brings tactile control to live content creation
- COLORFUL wins innovation award from Intel
- Composer Olivier Deriviere pioneers real-time generated interactive music for GET EVEN
- BIOSTAR launches compact high-speed storage solution with M200 M.2 SSD
- EpicGear launches MORPHA X RGB fully modular gaming mouse