Test System Setup
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ AM2
Memory: 2x 1GB DDR2-1066 Corsair (Supplied by Corsair)
Hard Disk: 500GB Seagate 7200.9 SATA (Supplied by Seagate)
Graphics Card: Integrated Graphics and ATI Radeon X1300XT
Cooling: Gigabyte K8 Neon (Supplied by Gigabyte)
Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP SP2
Drivers: ATI SB600 Driver 2.506.1540.28, ATI Catalyst 7.1,
ForceWare 93.71 and DX9c
Our test systems this time are setup to test the boards using integrated graphics.
For comparison we used an MSI K9NGM2 which is based on the GeForce 6150 integrated graphics core. We tested both systems out using the same size frame buffer of 256MB which is the largest the GeForce 6150 supports. We then also pushed the AMD 690G to 512MB frame buffer which is the highest this chip supports.
We also used an ATI X1300XT for external graphics to see what type of performance impact there is when using the onboard graphics.
Let's move on and check out the performance numbers now!
EVEREST Ultimate Edition
Version and / or Patch Used: 2006
Developer Homepage: http://www.lavalys.com
Product Homepage: http://www.lavalys.com
EVEREST Ultimate Edition is an industry leading system diagnostics and benchmarking solution for enthusiasts PC users, based on the award-winning EVEREST Technology. During system optimizations and tweaking it provides essential system and overclock information, advanced hardware monitoring and diagnostics capabilities to check the effects of the applied settings. CPU, FPU and memory benchmarks are available to measure the actual system performance and compare it to previous states or other systems.
When the integrated graphics are turned on, the hit on the memory performance is pretty severe; however there is little performance impact between using the 512MB and the 256MB frame buffers.
With the integrated graphics turned off you can see there is no difference between the two boards thanks to the integrated memory controller being on the AMD CPU itself - the chipsets have nothing to do with this part.