Motherboard: Gigabyte P965-DQ6 with F6 BIOS (Supplied by Gigabyte) Memory: 2x 1GB DDR2-1066 Corsair (Supplied by Corsair) Hard Disk: 500GB Seagate 7200.9 (Supplied by Seagate) Graphics Card: nVidia GeForce 7800GT Cooling: Gigabyte 3D Galaxy 2 (Supplied by Gigabyte) Operating System: Microsoft Windows XP SP2 Drivers: Intel INF 8.1.1.1002, nVidia ForceWare 91.47 and DX9c
Today we are going to be testing out the Core 2 Quad Q6700 against the Core 2 Duo E6700.
Both processors are clocked at a default core of 2.66GHz. We then also did some overclocking where we managed to hit 3.2GHz on the Core 2 Quad and 3.22GHz on the Core 2 Duo. The results have been recorded for your reference.
So, do the extra cores on the new Core 2 Quad offer any tangible performance increases? Lets take a closer look at our results.
SiSoft Sandra (System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is a synthetic Windows benchmark that features different tests used to evaluate different PC subsystems.
Here we can see that the Core 2 Quad has advantage at both stock and overclocked speeds in the CPU Arithmetic and Multimedia benchmarks, however, both score equal in memory bandwidth in stock and overclocked modes.
This ForwardView webshow describes areas where IBM can help you maximize savings without minimizing your competitive edge. Like selecting machines with a sleep mode, reducing server sprawl with virtualization, investing in more efficient equipment, and IT outsourcing.