TweakTown

   
Small Font
Large Font
  
Normal Width
Increase Width
  Home
       News
     Articles
      Guides
     Gaming
     Forums
   Daily Deals
Shopping   
              Audio Reviews Casing & Cooling Reviews CPU & Chipset Reviews Digital Lounge Guides Memory Reviews Mobile Reviews Motherboard Reviews Networking Reviews Software Reviews Storage Reviews Visual Reviews
  Search
   
   RSS Content Feeds
       



 

home > articles > cpu & chipset > battle of the 64-bit budget cpu - sempron 64 vs. celeron d 64 > page 3
Battle of the 64-bit Budget CPU - Sempron 64 vs. Celeron D 64

Author: Cameron Johnson SUMMARY: Which budget 64-bit CPU platform offers the best bang for buck? Read on as we investigate Sempron 64 vs. Celeron D 64.
Editor: Cameron Wilmot
Category: CPU & Chipset
Published: 7th March 2006

Email this ArticlePrint out a copy of Battle of the 64-bit Budget CPU - Sempron 64 vs. Celeron D 64


Rate our Content Now!

Thumbs UpThumbs Down

Our Test Processors

Before we get into the specifics of the tests we thought it might be good to show the test candidates.



Here we show the top side of the CPU’s. Both use an alloy heatspreader on the top which aids in two respects. First is to transfer heat evenly. The die itself on both CPU’s is rather small and fragile. In order to increase the amount of surface area, a large alloy block is placed on the die of the CPU. This means the die has to heat up a greater area before it overheats, however, having an extra piece of metal between the die and heatsink does mean less heat transfer - it’s a catch 22 situation.

The second reason is the die’s strength or lack there of. As many know first hand (including me) the die of the CPU, when exposed, is very fragile. AMD Athlon XP owners know this all too well, as even a small chip when installing the heatsinks leads to CPU death. Adding a heatspreader prevents the heatsink damaging the die even when large pressure is on the CPU from the heatsink.



Flipping over the CPU’s we see a contrast of differences. First off AMD uses a 754 pin layout with a brown PCB. No resistors or capacitors are exposed, just a small gap in the middle. Intel Celeron-D however is built on the Socket 775 format. This means there are no pins on the CPU at all to bend. When dealing with micro pins like AMD, Intel has the advantage of not having any pins on the CPU to damage, only on the motherboard. Overall we do prefer a pin-less setup on the CPU as it’s more practical to replace a cheap motherboard rather than an expensive CPU if a pin is to be broken or bent.




Overclocking

For this article, we are going to test the CPU’s both stock, and both overclocked to their highest level reached. Sempron has one advantage over Intel Celeron-D, with the Sempron you can change the multiplier from its default down; this means you can clock the bus up to high levels while still keeping the CPU close to a sane clock speed. Celeron-D however doesn’t give this option, so you are stuck with your default multiplier.

With our Sempron sample we clocked it from 1.8GHz to 2.13GHz using a ratio of 9x and a FSB of 236MHz. For our Celeron we clocked it from 2.8GHz to 3.17GHz using the default 21x ratio and a FSB of 151 or 604 MHz.



Previous Page Page 3 of 14 Next Page


Share your thoughts!
Talk about "Battle of the 64-bit Budget CPU - Sempron 64 vs. Celeron D 64" in our forums!



[Related Content] You may be interested in:
Intel Atom vs. VIA Nano Platform Comparo
AMD Phenom X4 9350e – Low Cost Quad Core
Energy Efficient Computing with Intel
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 - Budget Penryn
AMD Athlon 4850e & 780G as HTPC Platform

Subscribe to TweakTown's Newletter!
  Preview
We will not sell or share your details

Free Technology Magazines

Virtualization Everywhere

Access our featured guide, Virtualization Everywhere, and learn how you can easily virtualize your servers without the high cost and complexity.

Latest in PC Gaming

Mass Effect PC Review
A console RPG ported to the PC - sounds scary, but Mass Effect PC was in good hands with BioWare.
Overclocked: A History of Violence PC Review
While adventure gaming is no longer the PC's finest, games like Overclocked prove there is still quality to be had.
TrackMania United Forever PC Review
United Forever offers a great way for new comers to jump right into TrackMania, but series veterans should be warned - this is not a true sequel.
Assassin's Creed Director's Cut Edition PC Review
This console original feels quite at home on PC, but most criticisms remain.
Trials 2 Second Edition PC Review
Fun, addictive, and yet extremely challenging and frustrating. Introducing the ultimate time waster, Trials 2 SE.

Copyright © 1999-2008 Tweak Town Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Advertising | RSS Content Feeds | Awards and Ratings | About Us | Contact Us | Legal