Test System Setup
Processor(s): AMD Athlon 64 3800+
Video card(s): ATI Radeon X700PRO (Supplied by ATI)
Memory: 1 X 512MB OCZ PC3200 (Supplied by OCZ Technology)
Hard Disk(s): Western Digital Raptor 74.6GB SATA 10,000RPM (Supplied by Western Digital)
Operating System Used: Windows XP Professional SP1
Drivers Used: ATI Catalyst 4.11, DirectX 9C and reference chipset drivers from ATI and nVidia
We have as usual thrown a number of real world and synthetic tests at the motherboards to find out which one comes out on top. The reason for the X700PRO being used in both tests is due to the fact that we did receive the ATI motherboard before the nVidia motherboard and that the ATI motherboard came with the graphics card.
Since the nVidia motherboard didn't offer Firewire we didn't do a graph comparing the performance. We did test 1394 on the ATI chipset though which gave us a read speed of 35.1MB/s and a CPU usage of 2%. When we compare the transfer speeds to results in the past it is considered quite poor as we saw the ABIT AA8 (Intel 925 chipset and Pentium 4) offer almost 65MB/s and the same CPU usage.
Version and / or Patch Used: 2004
Developer Homepage: http://www.sisoftware.co.uk
Product Homepage: http://sisoftware.jaggedonline.com/index.php?location=home&a=TTA&lang=en
SiSoft Sandra (System ANalyser, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant) is a synthetic Windows benchmark that features different tests used to evaluate different PC subsystems.
Performance on both motherboards is quite similar as far as synthetic memory benchmarks go which is to be expected as the memory controller is built onto the actual processor.
Looking at the performance above, we can see that performance is still quite similar.
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 1 [Introduction]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 2 [ATI 200 Series in Detail]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 3 [The Photos - ATI]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 4 [nVidia nForce 4 in Detail]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 5 [The Photos - nVidia]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 6 [Benchmarks - Test System Setup and SiSoft Sandra]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 7 [Benchmarks - PCMark]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 8 [Benchmarks - 3DMark2001 SE]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 9 [Benchmarks - 3DMark03]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 10 [Benchmarks - 3DMark05]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 11 [Benchmarks - Doom 3]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 12 [Benchmarks - USB Performance with HD Tach]
- nForce 4 vs. ATI 200 Series - Page 13 [Final Thoughts]
Recommended for You
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Latest News Posts
- Deus Ex: Mankind Divided has gone gold, is ready for August 24 release
- EA is centralizing its Battlefield games under a single UI
- AMD details their new Radeon RX 470 and RX 460 graphics cards
- Watch 26 minutes of leaked No Man's Sky footage
- Last day for Windows 10 free upgrade is today
- Z170 Deluxe Help Setup with RAID10 + SSD for OS
- C2750D4i no POST turns off after couple of seconds
- Linksys EA9500 MAX-STREAM AC5400 Wireless Router Review
- GA-X58A-UD7 Error Code 88 (or 8b something)
- Polaris Nitro-charged - introducing the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 480
- AccelStor debuting NeoSapphire 3706-ES1 at Flash Memory Summit 2016
- Elitegroup ceremoniously launches ECS H110S-2P mini-STX motherboard and the all-new LIVA Pro Mini PC
- MSI announces custom GeForce GTX 1060 graphics cards
- Seagate unveils the industry's broadest 10TB portfolio