As with any purchasing decision, there is always the question of whether or not to make the jump to the next level of performance. The advent of a new class of consumer HDDs geared for NAS usage has blurred the line between consumer and nearline/enterprise HDD's. We have conducted full product evaluations of both the WD Red and the WD Se as single units, and today we will test them in RAID configurations.
WD's NAS HDD market segmentation is a perfect example of the shrinking difference between top-of-the-line nearline/enterprise HDD's and consumer hardware. The WD Red series is geared for the SMB and SOHO crowd with 1-5 bay NAS units. For a small price premium, customers can acquire the higher rated WD SE series of HDDs, geared for SMB (Small/Medium Business) and large enterprise applications with 6-12 bays.
In many cases, users looking for the next level of performance from their 1-5 bay NAS units turn to the WD Se. Both the WD Se and the WD Red share many characteristics that begin with the SATA 6Gb/s connection. They also share the same 64MB of cache and a bit error rate of 1 per 10E14. Both HDD's are designed for 24/7 use, and the duty cycle of a NAS HDD experiences many transitions from various idle states to active use. This is reflected in the robust 300,000 cycles Load/Unload cycle ratings for both drives.
One of the immediate performance improvements when making the jump from the Red to the Se is the difference in platter speed. The Red utilizes WD's IntelliPower technology, which many speculate alters the speed between 5,400 and 5,900 RPM's. The 7,200 RPM advantage leads to enhanced speed from the Se, but also an increase in power consumption. The Red consumes a peak of 4.5 Watts active, while the Se has a higher active consumption of 9.5 Watts. The noise of NAS HDD's can become a bit of a distraction in home user environments, and the WD Red has a lower decibel rating of 24, in contrast to the 28 offered by the Se.
The Se has a higher tolerance to heavy workloads, with up to 180 TB a year falling within its endurance envelope. The Red supports 120-150 TB a year, which is fine for most home users. Interestingly enough, the Red actually has a higher MTBF rating of one million hours, while also having a much shorter warranty period of three years. The WD Se has an MTBF rating of 800,000 hours, yet a longer warranty period of five years.
The disparity between the MTBF and warranty periods from both drives likely stems from the test environments during qualification. In larger rack environments, which the Se is designed for, there is a tremendous increase in vibration and heat. Vibration is introduced by other drives in the rack, and with the intended purpose being 6-12 drive racks, the drives are subjected to more vibration and heat. The drives are also tested with their respective workloads, and with the Se having a higher 180TB rating, the drive endures a more stringent test regimen.
In similar environments, the Se will outlive the Red, as reflected in the warranty period. The warranty period of a NAS is important, many users simply want to buy several high-quality drives, configure them in the NAS, and forget them for the next several years. For many the higher warranty period of five years for the Se, and the enhanced speed, make them an attractive solution.
Today we will test the 4-drive RAID performance of the WD Se and the WD Red series head-to-head in both RAID 0 and RAID 5 configurations.
PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.
United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.
United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.
Australia: Find other tech and computer products like this over at PLE Computer's website.
Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.
- Page 1 [Introduction]
- Page 2 [Test System and Methodology]
- Page 3 [RAID 0 4K Random Read/Write]
- Page 4 [RAID 0 128K Sequential Read/Write]
- Page 5 [RAID 0 Database/OLTP and Fileserver]
- Page 6 [RAID 0 Emailserver and Webserver]
- Page 7 [RAID 5 4K Random Read/Write]
- Page 8 [RAID 5 128K Sequential Read/Write]
- Page 9 [RAID 5 Database/OLTP and Fileserver]
- Page 10 [RAID 5 Emailserver and Webserver]
- Page 11 [Final Thoughts]
- We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Recommended for You
Latest News Posts
- Early Access games dominate Steam game sales in 2015
- Report: Mega Man movie gets greenlit by Fox
- We Heard You Like Discounts
- Acer's new 10-core smartphone will 'dominate' Android gaming
- The first big patch for Windows 10 is coming soon
- TP-LINK Archer C3200 Tri-Band AC3200 Wireless Router Review
- Does my motherbord support this RAM ?
- Windows 10 Pro 64bit on GA990FXA-UD3 R5 advice for USB3 problem
- Seagate Game Drive 2TB Xbox STEA2000403 Add-on Storage Device Review
- How can you find updated drivers like people post to this site all the time?
- SEAGATE DELIVERS INDUSTRY'S BROADEST PORTFOLIO OF 8TB HARD DRIVES
- CYBERTRONPC ANNOUNCES SMALL FORM FACTOR SYSTEM WITH AMD R9 NANO GRAPHICS CARD
- SilverStone Storage Devices - Mobile Series - MS08
- ASRock Z170 OC Formula Sets More Records at IDF 2015 San Francisco!
- ATTO Technology to Display Network and Storage Connectivity Portfolio at VMworld 2015