Tech content trusted by users in North America and around the world
6,412 Reviews & Articles | 42,731 News Posts

AquaMark 3 - Time for nVidia to face the reality? - Benchmarks - 3DMark03 - High Detail

In two days time Massive Development in Germany will release AquaMark 3, a fully compliant DX9 benchmark which offers gamers the ability to measure the performance of their graphics cards for the next 12 months. With all the news of poor DX9 performance from nVidia's NV35 lately, Cameron "Mr.Tweak" Wilmot has posted an article examining the performance under AquaMark 3 compared to ATI's R350 while taking a preview look at the upcoming benchmark. Read on!

By: | Benchmarks in Software | Posted: Sep 13, 2003 4:00 am

3DMark03 Mother Nature DX9 - High Detail


- 1024x768x32



In the first of our high quality tests of AA under 3DMark03 and possibly the most important of the lot, we see the Radeon killing the FX with new drivers by an amazing 25%.


The increase in performance of the new drivers over the old drivers is only about 5% - a nice increase, but is it enough to make nVidia competitive against ATI?


- 1280x1024x32



As we increase the resolution, the Radeon is still way ahead by 24%. The new drivers offer a slightly higher performance increase of 5.3% over the older drivers - slowly getting better.


- 1600x1200x32



When we increase the resolution right up to 1600x1200, the 128MB Radeon is still able to maintain its lead of a little over 25% against the 256MB FX. The Detonator 50 drivers earn a little bit of respect giving around 6% increase in performance over the older drivers in this test, though it is hardly enough to conquer the ATI gladiator.


Considering the Radeon, with ONLY 128MB, is 25% faster than the FX with 256MB, nVidia really needs to get to work and improve their driver performance by another 2 or 3 times, at least, to be anywhere near ATI when we are talking about maximum detail graphics - AA and AF enabled - which will become more and more important from now on. There is only so much performance increase attainable through software optimization. It really may be time for nVidia to face the reality.


The slowest the Radeon ever was against the FX with either driver, in any test, was never anymore than 8% while the FX at its worst was up to 26% slower in some tests. When the FX was slower than the Radeon, it tended to be a lot higher than 8%. The only other thing we can attribute the slow performance to is better image quality - and this just happens to be what we are looking at on the next page. Maybe it's nVidia's answer to poor frame rates, let's find out if this is the case or not.


Further Reading: Read and find more Software content at our Software reviews, guides and articles index page.

Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!

Latest News Posts

View More News Posts

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Press Releases

View More Press Releases
Or Scroll Up Or Down