Tech content trusted by users in North America and around the world
6,417 Reviews & Articles | 42,792 News Posts
TRENDING NOW: NVIDIA acquires Valve, announces Half-Life 3 release for 2016

AquaMark 3 - Time for nVidia to face the reality? - Conclusion

In two days time Massive Development in Germany will release AquaMark 3, a fully compliant DX9 benchmark which offers gamers the ability to measure the performance of their graphics cards for the next 12 months. With all the news of poor DX9 performance from nVidia's NV35 lately, Cameron "Mr.Tweak" Wilmot has posted an article examining the performance under AquaMark 3 compared to ATI's R350 while taking a preview look at the upcoming benchmark. Read on!

By: | Benchmarks in Software | Posted: Sep 13, 2003 4:00 am



There is no more appropriate time than to say "the benchmarks speak for themselves". Massive's AquaMark 3 does not paint a particularly good picture for nVidia, at all, in the DX9 department.


It would be convenient to say the Radeon 9800 Pro we tested had 256MB of RAM onboard but it only had 128MB and that is the scary part. Minus only a few benchmarks, the Radeon was able to knock down the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra with 256MB of RAM onboard, with either driver, time after time in both low and high detail tests, sometimes by very high margins. The new Detonator 50 drivers increase AA performance under 3DMark03 by a fair margin but when it comes to AquaMark 3, something horrible is happening and we aren't 100% what - and nVidia cannot blame it on increased image quality, because as we saw - it has only improved a little and not enough to account for the drop in frame rate. Maybe nVidia has not yet optimized their drivers for AquaMark 3 but the benchmark, albeit unreleased to the public, isn't exactly new to developers and manufacturers, and I would be very surprised if nVidia has not been working in conjunction with Massive to improve their driver support for their card owners.


Non-AA performance of the Detonator 50 drivers has increased performance fairly well across the board which nVidia should be congratulated on but it is nowhere near enough to compete with ATI and the raw power and DX9 efficiency the Radeon 9800 Pro is generating. nVidia had it their way for quite some time with DX7 and DX8, but as more DX9 related games and benchmarks start emerging, ATI are going to be able to produce a better name for themselves with the R350, as it is clearly better optimized for DX9 compared to nVidia's flagship which seemingly just can't stand the heat at the present time.


I very much doubt nVidia are not aware of this situation, in fact I'd say right now it would be at the top of their list of stuff needing fixing ASAP before it starts affecting their bottom line too much. Until nVidia come out with their next-gen GPU, ATI will lead the graphics card performance market with a GPU which has proven itself here today as being designed much better for DX9 games and applications than nVidia did with their NV35.


Right of Reply

We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Further Reading: Read and find more Software content at our Software reviews, guides and articles index page.

Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!

Got an opinion on this content? Post a comment below!

Latest News Posts

View More News Posts

Forum Activity

View More Forum Posts

Press Releases

View More Press Releases
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Or Scroll Up Or Down