The Office of Film and Literature Classification - Friend or Foe? - Continued
Where the issue of the OFLC and censorship has been in the news is in regards to gaming. In there exists no 'R' rating. This means that if the OFLC deem the content is too strong to fit into the 'MA' rating, the game will therefore be banned. The distributor of the game will then have the choice of making changes to the game and re-submitting, or pulling the content from Australian shelves, a very lucrative market for which no extra concessions are generally made, compared to content prepared for European audiences.
Over the last few years as technology has improved, the current crop of computer game consoles, namely PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, can now feature far more detailed images and their sophistication means that more film-like content can be achieved. This includes tackling more serious subject matter. The poles have moved which has now created a problem for the OFLC. The current guidelines were established in 1996, nearly 15 years ago. Back then, gaming was far more rudimentary and considerably less grown up than it is now. Compounding this issue is the fact that Australia is the only first world country that does not have an R18 rating for games.
Over the last few years, many games have been caught up in this issue. Whilst a few have been decidedly low brow in content, banned games are increasingly coming from well established and respected franchises. TakeTwo's Grand Theft Auto III, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City,Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, and Grand Theft Auto IV have all initially been banned and subsequently edited and passed. Silent Hill: Homecoming, Fallout 3, Left for Dead 2 were all banned before edited versions were re-submitted. More recently and spectacularly, Aliens Vs Predator and Fear 2 were both initially banned, until lawyers were involved. Both were re-submitted and passed in the 'MA' category with no cuts made.
Now, this brings me to my personal argument for an R18+ rating. I personally have played Aliens Vs Predator and the forthcoming God of War III (passed without cuts) and my own personal opinion is that very, very borderline should they be included in the MA category. I feel that the OFLC, in not wanting to court controversy is allowing games to slip into the lesser category so they can be available in the Australian market, even though they probably should not.
Soon after Aliens vs Predator was initially banned, Sony Computer Entertainment Australia prepared God of War III for rating. Lawyers for the company had prepared very detailed arguments and put a lot of time and money into ensuring that their game would pass. Ultimately, they had their way with the outcome. This is not the way that censorship should be conducted. But for a game distributor to feel they need to do this, it shows that something needs to be done about our ratings system.
Currently, the Australian government is taking public submissions on the topic of "Should the Australian National Classification Scheme Include an R18+ classification category for computer games?" The paper can be viewed here. I would encourage all whom feel strongly about the issue to put their thoughts into words. You have until February 28th to do so.
Right of Reply
We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples to express their opinion of our content and thoughts. If any company representative of this product wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.
Page 2 of 2
Further Reading: Read and find more HT & Movies content at our HT & Movies reviews, guides and articles index page.
Do you get our RSS feed? Get It!