Technology content trusted in North America and globally since 1999
7,526 Reviews & Articles | 55,456 News Posts

The RAID 0 SSD Report - Intel vs. RunCore

By: Chris Ramseyer | RAID in Storage | Posted: May 7, 2009 6:08 am
Comment () | Email to a Friend | Font Size: AA

Test System

 

Processors: AMD Opteron 2356 (2.3GHz Quad-Core) x2

 

Motherboard: Tyan S2915-E (Supplied by Tyan)

 

Memory: Kingston KVR667D2S4P5/2G x4 (Supplied by Kingston)

 

Graphics Card: XFX 8800 GTX (Supplied by XFX USA)

 

Enclosure: Lian Li V2000

 

Cooling: Noctua NH-U12DO (Supplied by Noctua)

 

SATA Controller: Areca ARC-1231ML (Supplied by Areca)

 

SAS Controller: Areca ARC-1680i (Supplied by Areca)

 

Operating System: Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate X64

 

The Areca 1231ML RAID controller will be handling the arrays for both the Intel / Kingston X25-M and RunCore Pro IV arrays. When it comes to capacity the RunCore setup has a distinct advantage over the Intel array, 256GB compared to Intel's 160GB. Things change once inside the OS, though; the Intel drives have a useable 160GB but the RunCore drives once formatted shrink to 240GB.

 

On the price front Intel has an advantage since they recently lowered the price on their X25-M Series and the RunCore Pro IV drives were just launched. The Intel array has an MSRP of 780 USD while the RunCore Pro IV is 960 USD.

 

    PRICING: You can find products similar to this one for sale below.


    United States: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon's website.

    United Kingdom: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon UK's website.

    Canada: Find other tech and computer products like this over at Amazon Canada's website.

    We at TweakTown openly invite the companies who provide us with review samples / who are mentioned or discussed to express their opinion of our content. If any company representative wishes to respond, we will publish the response here.

Related Tags

loading