TweakTown

   
Small Font
Large Font
  
Normal Width
Increase Width
  Home
       News
     Articles
      Guides
     Gaming
     Forums
   Daily Deals
Shopping   
              Audio Reviews Casing & Cooling Reviews CPU & Chipset Reviews Digital Lounge Guides Memory Reviews Mobile Reviews Motherboard Reviews Networking Reviews Software Reviews Storage Reviews Visual Reviews
  Search
   
   RSS Content Feeds
       



 
home > articles > visual > mid-range graphics card warfare – amd vs. nvidia (q4 2006) > page 4
Mid-Range Graphics Card Warfare – AMD vs. nVidia (Q4 2006)

Author: Shane Baxtor SUMMARY: Back after Xmas, we look at graphics cards from AMD and nVidia and compare all current mid-range products as of Q4 2006.
Editor: Cameron Wilmot
Category: Visual
Published: 27th December 2006

Email this ArticlePrint out a copy of Mid-Range Graphics Card Warfare – AMD vs. nVidia (Q4 2006)


Rate our Content Now!

Thumbs UpThumbs Down

Test System Setup

Processor(s): Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3150MHz (350MHz FSB 1:1)
Motherboard(s): ASUS P5B Deluxe (Supplied by ASUS)
Memory: 2 X 1GB G.Skill HZ PC8000 @ 350MHz 4-4-4-12 (Supplied by Bronet)
Hard Disk(s): Hitachi 80GB 7200RPM SATA 2
Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP2
Drivers: AMD Catalyst 6.12, nVidia ForceWare 93.71 and DX9c


Our main focus will be GeForce 7600GT versus Radeon X1650XT along with GeForce 7900GS versus Radeon X1950PRO. At the same time though we will compare them all against each other and see exactly what you get for your money.

Without going on let’s have a look exactly what we have and where your money is best spent this holiday season.



3DMark05

Version and / or Patch Used: Build 130
Developer Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com
Product Homepage: http://www.futuremark.com/products/3dmark05/
Buy It Here




3DMark05 is now the second latest version in the popular 3DMark “Gamers Benchmark” series. It includes a complete set of DX9 benchmarks which tests Shader Model 2.0 and above.

For more information on the 3DMark05 benchmark, we recommend you read our preview here.




We have seen the Radeon graphics cards take quite the lead in 3DMark05 these days. It seems to mean little, though, because as soon as we get into the more intensive games, we begin to see where all the cards actually sit in terms of real-world performance.



Previous Page Page 4 of 11 Next Page


Share your 
thoughts!
Talk about "Mid-Range Graphics Card Warfare – AMD vs. nVidia (Q4 2006)" in our forums!



[Related Content] You may be interested in:
Palit Radeon HD 4870 Sonic 1GB Graphics Card
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2 In CrossfireX
BFG Tech GeForce GTX 260 OCX Graphics Card
MSI Radeon HD 4670 Graphics Card
Sapphire Radeon HD 4550 Graphics Card

Subscribe to TweakTown's Newletter!
  Preview
We will not sell or share your details



Will you upgrade to the Intel Core i7 "Nehalem" CPU?

Yes – immediately
Yes – but later on
Maybe
No, I’m happy with my current CPU
Waiting for AMD to respond
What the heck is Nehalem?

View Poll Results
View More Polls


Latest in PC Gaming

Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning PC Review
EA take on the MMORPG titans with a giant of their own in Warhammer Online.
Spore PC Review
2008's biggest PC title is here, and it doesn't disappoint. Well, not much, anyway.
Mass Effect PC Review
A console RPG ported to the PC - sounds scary, but Mass Effect PC was in good hands with BioWare.
Overclocked: A History of Violence PC Review
While adventure gaming is no longer the PC's finest, games like Overclocked prove there is still quality to be had.
TrackMania United Forever PC Review
United Forever offers a great way for new comers to jump right into TrackMania, but series veterans should be warned - this is not a true sequel.

Copyright © 1999-2008 Tweak Town Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Advertising | RSS Content Feeds | Awards and Ratings | About Us | Contact Us | Legal

Business Software Computers